Hi!!! Im guessing you are in Grade 7 because i have this question too. Well the answer is simple. i got it from Figure 2.17 on page 51 .... :
Modern communities often destroy natural habitat when they expand.
YOUR WelCOME !!! :)
--Emmy Ionian ..... :) //Real name Mary Y . :)
The loss of an important population of animals or plants could create a ripple effect throughout the ecosystem. It may disrupt food chains, alter habitat structure, and lead to imbalances in population dynamics. This could ultimately impact biodiversity, ecosystem stability, and the services provided by the ecosystem.
If species disappeared from an ecosystem the balance in the ecosystem will be altered.
If the population of eagles in a grassland ecosystem suddenly decreased, the most immediate effect would likely be an increase in the populations of their prey species, such as small mammals and birds. This could lead to overgrazing or overpopulation of these species, resulting in negative impacts on plant life and overall biodiversity. Additionally, the decline of eagles may disrupt the balance of the food web, potentially allowing other predators to increase in number and alter the ecosystem dynamics.
If the streams dried up, the populations of fish and aquatic invertebrates would decline due to loss of habitat. This would impact predators that rely on these species for food, potentially leading to a domino effect of species decline or shift in the food web within the ecosystem.
It would affect it greatly. The sea otter is considered keystone because it feeds on sea urchins, who in turn feed on kelp. Without the sea otter, sea urchin populations would rise, leading to probable destruction of the kelp forests
There would be less animals
it would effect it because there would be too much of what the bald eagles eat and they would eat all of their food and get hungry.and ah... no more mysterious deaths!
The ecosystem would crumble. Every animal provides a valuable role in the ecosystem
A loss of a producer means that there will be less food for consumers since producers are the foundation of an ecosystem
it would have still endangered sooo...... dont bother them
Some people or animals will die.
Some of the limiting factors that would affect dragonflies would be climate, rain, temperature, and other species in the environment. Species that ate the dragonflies would have the largest effect.
A building will effect a watershed because if you have a building, it will cover up some of the land that was used where the water flows so you would have to redirect the water flow to a different area.
The loss of an important population of animals or plants could create a ripple effect throughout the ecosystem. It may disrupt food chains, alter habitat structure, and lead to imbalances in population dynamics. This could ultimately impact biodiversity, ecosystem stability, and the services provided by the ecosystem.
abiotic features of any ecosystem affect every aspect of a living organism. These factors include light, climate, precipitation and nutrient availability etc.
If an ecosystem lost all its plant species, it would disrupt the food chain as plants are primary producers. This would lead to a cascade effect, impacting herbivores, predators, and ultimately the entire ecosystem. Nutrient cycles would also be disrupted, affecting soil health and ecosystem stability.
I think we would be driving on roads that looked like they were built in ancient Rome.