The evidence that the space that constitutes our Universe has been expanding since about 13.7 billion years ago is overwhelming.
1) all galaxies outside our Local Group are red-shifted, meaning the distance between these galaxies and us is increasing.The size of this red shift is directly proportional to the distance between us and those galaxies. The time when all of the visible (to us, anyway) matter was compacted as far as we can understand, is called the Big Bang. Calculation of the Hubble Constant gives that time at about 13 billion years ago. Interestingly, this time agrees with the ratio of slow-decaying elements AND the age of the oldest known stars.
2) this hypothesis predicted, in 1946, the existence of an isotropic and uniform microwave radiation whose spectrum would match that of a black-body at 3.7 K. The cosmic microwave background radiation was found eighteen years later and corresponds perfectly with the prediction.
3) the hypothesis predicts that all parts of our Universe would constitute 90% hydrogen and 10% helium -- exactly as seen.
No other hypotheses can explain (2) or (3) better than saying, "That's just the way our Universe is -- we can't explain why."
4) Long-evolved galaxies are seen close to us, but none are seen far from us. This is impossible to explain EXCEPT with the simple idea that, at a far distance from us, we can ONLY see galaxies that have not had time to evolve for a long time.
Edwin Hubble discovered that the distances to far away galaxies were generally proportional to their redshifts-an idea originally suggested by Lemaître in 1927. Hubble's observation was taken to indicate that all very distant galaxies and clusters have an apparent velocity directly away from our vantage point: the farther away, the higher the apparent velocity.
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
expansion of the universe as shown by the Hubble constant3K universal microwave background radiationetc.
No
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
Discard it all.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
expansion of the universe as shown by the Hubble constant3K universal microwave background radiationetc.
The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
No
yes it will happen again after the big crunch then of course, the big munch..... At present there is no evidence that another Big Bang will occur.
He doesn't
Some questions about the Big Bang theory and its implications for the origin of the universe include: What caused the Big Bang? How did the universe evolve after the Big Bang? What evidence supports the Big Bang theory? What are the implications of the Big Bang for our understanding of the universe's beginning and future?
No, it's the other way round. The Big Bang is responsible for the redshift.