It largely supports anatomical evidence and provides more detailed information for specific relationships
Harry Hess proposed the theory of seafloor spreading, which provided physical evidence for the movement of the Earth's crust. Alfred Wegener proposed the theory of continental drift, which lacked a mechanism to explain how continents moved. Hess's theory had more scientific support and evidence, leading to greater acceptance by the scientific community.
Scientists believe that several key pieces of evidence support the Big Bang theory, including the observed expansion of the universe, cosmic microwave background radiation, and the abundance of light elements like hydrogen and helium. The redshift of distant galaxies indicates that the universe is expanding, while the cosmic microwave background radiation is thought to be the afterglow of the initial explosion. Additionally, the proportions of light elements align with predictions made by Big Bang nucleosynthesis. Together, these observations provide strong support for the theory.
If you mean what scientist created the heliocentric theory, it was Nicolaus Copernicus. Based on astronomical observations, he determined that the Ptolemaic geocentric theory was incorrect, and replaced it with his own heliocentric theory, which placed the sun at the center of the universe, and had planets orbiting the sun.
One form of evidence used to support a theory can be experimental data that demonstrates a consistent relationship between variables. For instance, in the theory of evolution, the fossil record provides evidence of gradual changes in species over time, showing transitional forms that link different groups. Additionally, genetic analysis reveals similarities in DNA sequences across related species, reinforcing the idea of common ancestry. Such evidence collectively strengthens the validity of the theory.
Scientists may reject a theory if new evidence contradicts it, if it fails to make accurate predictions, or if a better theory emerges that explains the data more effectively. Rejection of a theory is a normal part of the scientific process as it leads to the refinement and advancement of knowledge.
The spreading of the sea floor.
science
i believe that the kracken really does exist, but we have no real evidence to prove that theory.....
I do not so much " believe it " as I an convinced by the myriad lines of converging evidences that support the theory of evolution by natural selection. talkorigins.org
It largely supports anatomical evidence and provides more detailed information for specific relationships
No. It means that it was the best theory supported at the time it was formulated. Theories can change if new scientific evidence provides new information.
No. It means that it was the best theory supported at the time it was formulated. Theories can change if new scientific evidence provides new information.
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
Answer 1Because they accept the myriad of evidence that underlines the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection.Answer 2Because they relied on evidences, observations, experiments. These are the basic premises of sciences. For an idea to be called a 'theory' in science required more evidences and tests, etc. A theory in science means more than what most lay people realize. A hypothesis in science is closer to what lay people think of as a 'theory' in daily usage. So when you hear the Theory of Evolution, there is substantial evidence behind it, just like there is for the Theory of Relativity or Theory of Gravitation.On the other hand, just because something has lots of evidence behind it does not mean it's correct. However, it takes a lot of counter-evidence to overturn a theory. Remember, it took a long time and substantial evidence to change the theory that the earth was not the center of the universe.
Some people believe in that theory, but some people believe in Adam and Eve. Scientists claim that they have found evidence that we started from apes.
Harry Hess proposed the theory of seafloor spreading, which provided physical evidence for the movement of the Earth's crust. Alfred Wegener proposed the theory of continental drift, which lacked a mechanism to explain how continents moved. Hess's theory had more scientific support and evidence, leading to greater acceptance by the scientific community.