0
What else can I help you with?
Would fossils of species that did not change noticeably over time be useful in determining the relative ages of rocks explain?
Yes, fossils of species that did not change noticeably over time, known as "index fossils," can be very useful in determining the relative ages of rocks. These fossils represent specific geological periods and can be used as markers to correlate the ages of rock layers across different locations. Their presence in a particular layer indicates that the rock is from the same time period as other layers containing the same fossils, aiding in the understanding of the geological timeline. Thus, even stable species can provide valuable information for stratigraphic correlation.
Why aren't fossils from metamorphic rocks useful?
I need the answer
Fossils that can be used to establish relative dates are most likely to be found in?
Sedimentary rocks, which form in layers over time, are most likely to contain fossils that can be used to establish relative dates. Fossils found in these rocks provide a record of the organisms that lived at specific times in Earth's history, allowing scientists to determine the relative age of the rock layers.
What fault can be useful in determining which of the following for a group of rocks?
the answer is procces of breaking down rock into smaller and smaller sediments
How are sedimentary rocks used used to determine the age of fossils?
Sedimentary rocks are used to determine the age of fossils through a method called biostratigraphy, which involves examining the distinct layers of rock (strata) where fossils are found. By identifying and correlating the types of fossils present in different layers, scientists can establish a relative age for the rocks based on the known age ranges of the fossils. Additionally, the principle of superposition, which states that younger layers are deposited on top of older layers, helps in determining the chronological sequence of events. For absolute dating, radiometric techniques can also be applied to volcanic layers above or below sedimentary rocks.
Would fossils of species that did not change noticeably over time be useful in determining the relative ages of rocks?
In order to be useful in determining the relative ages of rocks, an indicator must provide different indications for rocks of different ages, right? So how could something which doesn't change over time be useful?
Would fossils of species that did not change noticeably over time be useful in determining the relative ages of rocks explain?
Yes, fossils of species that did not change noticeably over time, known as "index fossils," can be very useful in determining the relative ages of rocks. These fossils represent specific geological periods and can be used as markers to correlate the ages of rock layers across different locations. Their presence in a particular layer indicates that the rock is from the same time period as other layers containing the same fossils, aiding in the understanding of the geological timeline. Thus, even stable species can provide valuable information for stratigraphic correlation.
Can fossils be used to determine the relative ages of rocks layers?
fossils can be used to determine the relative age of rock layer by using the classification of fossils to find the relative ages of rocks in which fossils are found. :] hoped i helped you out.
Why did scientists use trilobites as index fossils?
Scientists used trilobites as index fossils because they were abundant, had a wide distribution, and had a relatively short existence in the fossil record. This made them useful for correlating rock layers from different locations and determining the relative ages of the rocks.
A fault can be useful in determining which group of rocks?
A fault can be useful in determining the relative ages of different rock layers by showing which layers have been displaced or shifted due to tectonic forces. This can help geologists establish the sequence of events in an area's geological history.
Why aren't fossils from metamorphic rocks useful?
I need the answer
What fossils are most useful for correlation tend to be?
Fossils that are the most useful for correlation tend to be found in various types of rocks, are widespread, and easy to recognize. One rock type where fossils are found is sedimentary rocks.
Index fossils include graptolites?
Graptolites are excellent index fossils because they have a short-lived existence in the geologic time scale and are widespread. They are useful for dating rocks and correlating layers in different locations, assisting in determining the age of rocks and reconstructing past environments.
How can scientists determine the relative age of rocks and fossils an area?
nunya
How can fossills be used to determine the relative ages of rock layers?
fossils can be used to determine the relative age of rock layer by using the classification of fossils to find the relative ages of rocks in which fossils are found. :] hoped i helped you out.
Measurements of half-life make radioactive isotopes useful for?
They're useful for x-rays or looking at metals,or determining the age of rocks/fossils. (Hope it helped!😁)
Fossils that can be used to establish relative dates are most likely to be found in?
Sedimentary rocks, which form in layers over time, are most likely to contain fossils that can be used to establish relative dates. Fossils found in these rocks provide a record of the organisms that lived at specific times in Earth's history, allowing scientists to determine the relative age of the rock layers.
