0
Not sure what you are referring to, as the main rival to Big Bang Cosmology (BBC)-- the idea that our Universe has always existed in (about) its present state -- existed as far back as ancient Greek philosophers, and was held all cosmologists well into the 1900s. Jesuit priest Georges LeMaitre first proposed an expanding universe as a physical reality (as opposed to a mathematical idea) with observational consequences in 1931, but the acceptance of a universe with a starting point was resisted until the cosmic microwave background radiation was discovered in 1964.
Inflationary cosmology -- a subset of BBC -- was developed by Alan Guth in 1980 to explain some observations that BBC, on its own, could not easily deal with.
What else can I help you with?
What sort of radiation suggested evidence for the Big Bang?
The existence, isotropy, and spectrum of the cosmic microwave background radiation (cmbr) is extremely easy to explain if Big Bang Cosmology is true; it is impossible to reasonably explain even its existence with any alternate cosmological hypothesis.
Does a scientific hypothesis describe an observed pattern in nature without attempting to explain it?
False
What happens if a hypothesis does not explain an observation?
If a hypothesis does not explain an observation, it may be rejected as a valid explanation for that particular phenomenon. Scientists typically revise or discard hypotheses that fail to account for observed data in order to develop more accurate models and theories. This iterative process helps refine our understanding of the natural world.
How do you describe a pattern of inheritance that the blending hypothesis fails to explain?
A pattern of inheritance that the blending hypothesis fails to explain is incomplete dominance, where the heterozygous phenotype is intermediate between the two homozygous phenotypes. This contradicts the blending hypothesis, which suggests that the traits of the parents are mixed together in the offspring. In incomplete dominance, the traits remain distinct in the offspring.
The hypothesis of continental drift is used to explain an event that happened .?
200 million years ago
What hypothesis did Darwin developed to explain his findings after returning to England?
he developed main streams of dna
After Darwin returned to England what hypothesis did Darwin develop to explain his findings?
He developed main streams of DNA.
What sort of radiation suggested evidence for the Big Bang?
The existence, isotropy, and spectrum of the cosmic microwave background radiation (cmbr) is extremely easy to explain if Big Bang Cosmology is true; it is impossible to reasonably explain even its existence with any alternate cosmological hypothesis.
What is m-m hypothesis?
Hypothesis? Hypothesis is a proposal intended to explain certain facts or observations
What is a hypothesis that does not explain an observation?
When you are using the scientific method, you would try to imagine a hypothesis which explains an observation, but you might not succeed. A hypothesis that does not explain an observation would be considered a failed hypothesis. You would then need to invent a different hypothesis.
Did your data support your hypothesis?
so you have to put in did it help you explain your hypothesis
Explain Niels Bohr compound nucleus hypothesis?
give the compound nucleus hypothesis
What does the medical term hypothesis mean?
A hypothesis is a theory that attempts to explain a certain phenomenon.
What type of theory is not yet proven?
A theory that is not yet proven is often referred to as a hypothesis or a conjecture. These are proposed explanations or predictions that have not undergone rigorous testing or validation through empirical evidence. For example, the theory of dark matter in cosmology remains a compelling hypothesis, as it seeks to explain certain astronomical observations but has yet to be definitively confirmed through direct detection.
What is the of a conclusion?
to explain why the data support or reject the hypothesis
What if the results do not support the hypothesis you were testing?
Then explain why it was wrong
What is the difference between a hypothesis a theory and a conclusion drawn from hypothesis testing?
A hypothesis is a suggestion of a way to explain something. If the hypothesis is tested and confirmed, it can advance to the status of theory. The conclusion of testing a hypothesis will be either that the hypothesis is confirmed, or it is not confirmed.
