The strongest reason for thinking the first self-replicating life-form was not a protein lies in the role of nucleic acids, such as RNA, in early biological systems. RNA can both store genetic information and catalyze chemical reactions, which suggests it could facilitate self-replication and evolution more efficiently than proteins alone. Additionally, the RNA world hypothesis posits that RNA molecules predated proteins and played a crucial role in the origin of life, making it a more plausible candidate for the first self-replicating life-form.
The strongest protein bond is the disulfide bond, formed between two sulfur atoms from cysteine amino acids. It is covalent in nature and is important for maintaining the structure and stability of proteins.
Disulfide bonds are the strongest covalent bonds that stabilize a protein's tertiary structure. They form between cysteine residues that have sulfhydryl groups, creating a covalent linkage that can withstand denaturation forces.
Milky with protein... I'm thinking the prostate gland. Bacterial growth?
Messenger RNA (mRNA) is a type of RNA molecule that carries genetic information from the DNA in the cell's nucleus to the ribosomes in the cytoplasm. It serves as a template for protein synthesis during the process of translation.
protein
The strongest protein bond is the disulfide bond, formed between two sulfur atoms from cysteine amino acids. It is covalent in nature and is important for maintaining the structure and stability of proteins.
You are thinking of an antibody.
yep definitly. NO IT DOESN'T
denatured proteins do not function normally
Melamine is the chemical you're thinking of, but it's not an amino acid.
Disulfide bonds are the strongest covalent bonds that stabilize a protein's tertiary structure. They form between cysteine residues that have sulfhydryl groups, creating a covalent linkage that can withstand denaturation forces.
This question is slightly imprecise in its phrasing. All human cells and organs contain protein, so it is inevitable that kidneys contain protein; you cannot have kidneys without protein. However, what you are probably thinking of is the protein albumen, leaking from the kidneys into the urine. That is a sign of kidney damage, probably caused by a kidney stone.
no it doesn't... if you look up Richard sandrak on the internet A.K.A little Hercules hes the strongest kid in the world, and he has been tking protein shakes since he was 6 years old, and now he is 18 and he looks fine.
Milky with protein... I'm thinking the prostate gland. Bacterial growth?
It depends on what type of diet they is on to begin with. If protein powder is being used simply as an alternate source of protein, then by all means go for it. It provides an excellent amount of protein while skipping out on high amounts of fat and sodium that other high protein foods contain. Check out a whey protein (I prefer vanilla) or even a whey protein isolate blend for even more protein and less carbs/cholesterol. However, if they are already eating large amounts of protein/food, then it wouldn't be necessary to introduce even more protein into the diet. If you were thinking along the lines of "active kid+protein+more protein=better" then there will be little no benefit to saturating the body with more protein. A healthy, balanced diet full of vegetables and fruit would be better than excess protein. Best of luck!
Whether you are thinking of a pre-mixed shake or of a protein powder, it depends upon the individual manufacturer. Just to take one example, two and one-half scoops of Muscle Milk powder, which would normally be mixed with about 15 ounces of water, would provide that much protein. A Muscle Milk premixed shake is 17 ounces and contains 34 grams of protein.
NO, COVALENT BOND IS. i'M NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A NON-COVALENT OR COVALENT THOUGH I'm not sure if its the strongest but it's not a covalent or non-covalent because those are bonds that form between atoms and a hydrogen bond forms between molecules.