answersLogoWhite

0

Terrestrial plants evolved from ancestral green algae through a series of adaptations to land, such as developing structures for support and water retention. In contrast, Jovian plants, hypothetically existing on gas giants like Jupiter, would likely form through entirely different processes, possibly relying on gaseous materials and extreme atmospheric conditions, without the need for a solid substrate. Their development would be influenced by the unique chemical compositions and environmental factors of their Jovian atmospheres.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

What are the differences between the way terrestrial and jovian planet formation?

Terrestrial planets were formed by:the collapse of the solar nebulathe condensation of grainsthe growth of planetesimalsthe clearing of debrisJovian planets were formed by:the collapse of the solar nebulathe condensation of grainsthe growth of planetesimalsthe capturing of gasthe clearing of debris


Why are terrestrial planets small and Jovian planets big?

Terrestrial planets are small because they are composed primarily of rock and metal, which limits their size and density. They formed closer to the Sun, where higher temperatures prevented the accumulation of lighter gases. In contrast, Jovian planets are large because they formed farther from the Sun, where cooler temperatures allowed them to capture and retain significant amounts of hydrogen, helium, and other gases, leading to their massive sizes and thick atmospheres. This distinction in composition and formation location accounts for the size differences between the two types of planets.


What is the difference between metaporphic and igneos rock?

The difference between metaporphic and ignous rock are that ignous rock is formed by cooling of magma and metaporphic is formed by temperature and pressure changes inside the earth


What type of bond is between Metals with nonmetals of differing electronegativities?

If the difference in electronegativity between the metal and the non metal is above 1.7, then ionic bond is formed. If the difference in electronegativity between the metal and the non metal is below 1.7, then polar covalent bond is formed.


Which of the following is NOT a major difference between Venus and Earth?

Similarities Between Earth And VenusSome of the similarities are:Both Venus and Earth were formed about 4 ½ billion years ago by gas.Both Venus and Earth have a solid surface.Both Venus and Earth have about the same density, which means mass per unit volume.

Related Questions

What are the differences between the way terrestrial and jovian planet formation?

Terrestrial planets were formed by:the collapse of the solar nebulathe condensation of grainsthe growth of planetesimalsthe clearing of debrisJovian planets were formed by:the collapse of the solar nebulathe condensation of grainsthe growth of planetesimalsthe capturing of gasthe clearing of debris


What is the primary difference in composition between the Sun and the terrestrial planets is?

Dependant on how the debris from supernovae is moving, the proportions of certain materials present, and the initial conditions of solar systems forming different combinations of terrestrial and Jovian planets are formed. Terrestrial planets are comprised of heavier particles (ie. of higher relative atomic mass) meaning they have stronger gravity which leads to higher density planets than the gaseous Jovian planets. A Jovian planet can be thought of as a failed star - it has all the elements needed to fuel nuclear fusion, but not enough gravity to attain the nuclear activation energy required. So the Sun started as a large cloud mostly comprising of gases, and terrestrial planets were formed from clouds mostly consisting of heavy solids.


Why are Terrestrial planets closer to the sun then the Jovian planets?

Terrestrial planets are made of denser materials than Jovian planets. The planets were primarily formed from the left over disc of dust that orbited our sun when it first formed. The heavier elements were draw closer to the sun by gravity and the lighter ones flung further outward by their high orbital speed.


Why do Jovian planets have a thicker atmosphere than the terrestrial planets?

Jovian planets do not have a solid surface, therefore their atmospheres are thick all the say to where their surface would be. Their atmospheres have more gasses than those surrounding terrestrial planets.


What are the two main reason why Jovian planets have much thicker atmoshperes than the Terrestrial planets?

While terrestrial planets are made of rock and have gases in the atmosphere, jovian planets are made almost entirly of gases. If an atmosphere is made of gases in a planet, then the atmosphere of the planets with more gases will be thicker.


Why are terrestrial planets small and Jovian planets big?

Terrestrial planets are small because they are composed primarily of rock and metal, which limits their size and density. They formed closer to the Sun, where higher temperatures prevented the accumulation of lighter gases. In contrast, Jovian planets are large because they formed farther from the Sun, where cooler temperatures allowed them to capture and retain significant amounts of hydrogen, helium, and other gases, leading to their massive sizes and thick atmospheres. This distinction in composition and formation location accounts for the size differences between the two types of planets.


Why don't terrestrial planets have rings like the Jovian planets?

While the terrestrial planets are mostly rocky with metallic cores, the Jovian planets are huge balls of gas. The Jovian Planets are also much larger than the terrestrial ones.


How does the solar nebula theory explain the dramatic density difference between the terrestrial and jovian planets?

The solar nebula theory explains that planets are formed by solid bits of matter. What that matter is entirely dependent on the gas and substances available. The terrestrial planets in our solar system were located in the inner part of the solar nebula. This means that the temperatures were too high for the gas to condense into solids, leaving metals and silicates as the only solids from which the small and dense terrestrial planets could form. Meanwhile, the temperatures in the outer solar nebula were cold enough for the gases to form solid ice. The large Jovian planets then formed from the large amounts of ice particles available and were able to capture gas directly from the solar nebula because of how large they were. The solar nebula theory explains that planets are formed by solid bits of matter. What that matter is entirely dependent on the gas and substances available. The terrestrial planets in our solar system were located in the inner part of the solar nebula. This means that the temperatures were too high for the gas to condense into solids, leaving metals and silicates as the only solids from which the small and dense terrestrial planets could form. Meanwhile, the temperatures in the outer solar nebula were cold enough for the gases to form solid ice. The large Jovian planets then formed from the large amounts of ice particles available and were able to capture gas directly from the solar nebula because of how large they were.


What is the relationship between bonds and electronegativity?

If the electronegativity difference between the two atoms is above 1.7, then ionic bond is formed and if the difference is below 1.7, then covalent bond is formed.


What is the difference between the states formed by the First Civilizations and the empires formed between 500 BC and 500 CE?

3


What type of solar system objects would be formed inside the rock metal condensation line?

Inside the rock-metal condensation line of a solar system, objects such as terrestrial planets, asteroids, and meteoroids would be formed. These objects are mainly composed of rocky materials and metals, as lighter elements like hydrogen and helium would have been blown away due to the high temperatures closer to the Sun.


Which is not a Jovian planet?

Pluto is the only "planet" that isn't a planet. Well I think that the IAU still have not answered the question WHAT MAKES A PLANET A PLANET? Is it a certain size or something? Comment : The IAU have defined a planet. The definition is mainly about size, but it's not simple: 1) The object must be big enough for gravity to have formed it into a (roughly) spherical shape. 2) The object must be by far the largest object in the neighbourhood of its orbit. Pluto qualifies on 1) but fails on 2). Also, Venus and Mercury are sometimes called "morning stars" or "evening stars", but they are planets.