0
What is the caontrats the inductive model of theory construction with the deductive model?
The inductive model of theory construction involves developing general theories or hypotheses based on specific observations and empirical data, moving from specifics to broader generalizations. In contrast, the deductive model starts with established theories or hypotheses and tests them through specific observations, moving from general principles to specific instances. While inductive reasoning is often exploratory and open-ended, deductive reasoning is more confirmatory and structured. Together, these models represent different approaches to scientific inquiry and theory development.
What else can I help you with?
When a person uses creative thinking to combine isolated facts to arrive at an explanation for a natural event he is using?
In this scenario, the person is using deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning involves starting with a general theory or hypothesis and then applying it to specific situations to arrive at a conclusion.
John Dalton used inductive reasoning to develop his theories. True False?
True. John Dalton employed inductive reasoning to formulate his atomic theory, which was based on observations and experimental data. He gathered evidence from various chemical reactions and gas laws to draw generalized conclusions about the nature of atoms and their behavior. This approach helped him establish foundational principles in chemistry.
Describe how the elements of theory construction fit together?
Theory construction involves several interconnected elements, including concepts, propositions, and frameworks. Concepts serve as the fundamental building blocks, representing key ideas or phenomena. Propositions articulate relationships between these concepts, forming the basis for hypotheses that can be tested. Finally, frameworks provide an overarching structure that organizes these elements, guiding researchers in their investigations and fostering a coherent understanding of the subject matter.
Contary to ptolemy what did Copernicus argue concerning the construction of the universe?
Copernicus came up with a new theory of the planets' movements among the stars in 1543. It had the Sun at the centre instead of the Earth, which was in the centre in the ancient Ptolemaic theory. Both theories used circles and epicycles to describe the planet's orbits, which they modelled quite accurately. Copernicus's theory was promoted by Galileo. The modern theory retains Copernicus's idea of placing the Sun at the centre, but it uses elliptical orbits for the planets and was devised by Kepler (1609) working with the latest observations by Tycho Brahe.
What is the evidence of the asiatic theory?
The Asiatic theory suggests that Native Americans originated from Asia and migrated to the Americas via the Bering Land Bridge. Evidence supporting this theory includes genetic studies showing similarities between Asian and Native American populations, as well as archaeological findings of ancient tools and artifacts in both regions that are similar in style and construction. Additionally, linguistic studies have identified similarities between certain Native American languages and languages spoken in Siberia.
Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction?
Normative deductive approaches start with a general theory and apply it to specific cases, while inductive approaches start with observations and work towards general principles. Normative deductive approaches are more useful in theory construction as they allow for testing and refinement of theories based on observable data, whereas inductive approaches may lead to biased generalizations.
Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction-?
Normative deductive approach starts with a theory and uses deduction to derive hypotheses, while inductive approach starts with observations and uses induction to formulate a theory. The deductive approach is useful when researchers have a strong theoretical foundation and want to test specific hypotheses, while the inductive approach is useful when exploring new areas where little theory exists. The usefulness of each approach depends on the research question and context.
What is difference between inductive theory and deductive theory?
Inductive theory involves forming general principles based on specific observations, moving from specific instances to broader conclusions. Deductive theory involves applying general principles to specific situations, moving from general concepts to specific predictions or explanations. Essentially, inductive reasoning builds from observation to theory, while deductive reasoning applies theory to specific situations.
What type of reasoning was used in the development of evoiutionary theory?
The development of evolutionary theory involved both inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning was used to gather data from observations of natural phenomena, while deductive reasoning was used to derive general principles and hypotheses from this data. This combination of reasoning allowed scientists like Charles Darwin to formulate the theory of evolution.
What is the difference between inductive an deductive method?
Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as a "top down" approach, in other words deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. It often starts with a theory and is then narrowed down to an actual, testable hypothesis, that can be confirmed or denied by observation. Inductive reasoning is the inverse approach, a "bottom up" approach. It begins with an observation and through observation patterns and regularities are observed and can be applied to a more generalized theory.
What is a method of proceeding from facts to a conclusion?
it ic called deduction
What is the differences between inductive and deductive approaches to research theory?
Inductive approach involves generating theories based on observations and patterns identified in the data, while deductive approach tests existing theories against empirical evidence. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations, whereas deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific predictions. Both approaches are used in scientific research to build knowledge and test hypotheses.
Which stage of Piaget's cognitive development is marked by the use of inductive and deductive reasoning?
The formal operational stage (ages 12 and up) in Piaget's theory of cognitive development is marked by the use of inductive and deductive reasoning. During this stage, individuals can think abstractly and systematically, and use logical reasoning to solve problems.
What statement best describes deductive reasoning?
moving from general conclusions to specific observations
What type of reasoning is used when a scientist tests a hypothesis?
A scientist uses inductive reasoning when testing a hypothesis. This involves making generalizations based on specific observations or data. By testing the hypothesis through experiments or observations, the scientist can gather evidence to support or refute the hypothesis.
How do you formulate a deductive or inductive argument?
Deductive reasoning is reasoning that starts with general principles to form a conclusion about a specific case. To formulate a deductive argument, you should take a general idea or concept, like an ideology or commonly shared moral view and relate it to a more specific subject that links to your side of the argument. Inductive reasoning is the exact opposite; it involves developing a set of specific facts to create a general principle. To formulate an inductive argument, you should take a set of related facts and link them to an overarching moral or concept that supports your argument.
Difference between deductive and inductive research with example?
Inductive research starts off with specific observations and move toward general ideas or theory to capture what they show. (Qualitative) Deductive Research starts with a general idea or theory and then moves to test it by looking at specific observations. (Quantitative)
