Hydrostatic equilibrium basically means the object has a round shape - spherical if it doesn't spin quickly, in the form of an ellipsoid if it does.Self-gravitation is the mechanism that causes it. It means that all of the parts of the object attract one another.
The three classifications of a celestial body to be considered a planet are: it must orbit a star, it must have sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces and assume a nearly round shape (hydrostatic equilibrium), and it must have cleared its orbital neighborhood of other debris. These criteria help distinguish planets from other types of celestial bodies, such as dwarf planets and asteroids.
According to the IAU's definition:A "planet" is a celestial body that(a) is in orbit around the Sun,(b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and(c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
I assume you're asking about the criteria for being a "planet" as opposed to a "dwarf planet": In the Solar System, these boil down to: 1. is in orbit about the Sun Yes, Pluto orbits the Sun (or at least the barycenter of the Solar System as a whole, which is probably a better definition) 2. is in hydrostatic equilibrium True as far as we can tell, and we don't have any reason to believe it's NOT in hydrostatic equilibrium, since it's larger and more massive than several other objects that we know are in hydrostatic equilibrium. (By the way, in layman's terms, "hydrostatic equilibrium" = "more or less spherical".) 3. has "cleared the neighborhood" around its orbit. Pluto massively fails this one, since its orbit crosses Neptune's. This is the controversial part of the definition, by the way: has Neptune not "cleared its orbit" because of Pluto? Has Jupiter not "cleared its orbit" because of the Trojan asteroids? It basically comes down to "if your orbit crosses that of a body significantly larger than yourself, you're not a planet." It originally made sense to call Pluto a planet, because we thought it was a lot bigger than it turns out to actually be (As late as the early 1970s, you can find estimates of Pluto's size indicating that it was thought to be at least the size of Mars, and possibly as large as Earth.) We now know that not only is Pluto considerably smaller than the Moon, there are bodies of approximately the same size, or even larger, out there in roughly similar orbits. So it really makes sense to recategorize it as something similar to a large asteroid, such as Ceres, which is in fact what the IAU has done.
celestial globe is a physical model of celestial sphere
A planet has to be in orbit around the sun. It also has to be more or less spherical in shape, having a high enough mass and therefore gravity to achieve this 'hydrostatic equilibrium'. Thirdly, it has to have cleared it's orbit of most other matter - it has to dominate it's orbit, be the only main body at that particular distance from the sun.
A planet is a celestial body that orbits a star, is spherical in shape, and has cleared its orbital path of other debris. It must also meet the criteria set by the International Astronomical Union, which includes being in hydrostatic equilibrium and not being a satellite of another celestial body.
is a celestial body orbiting the Sun that is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity but has not cleared its neighbouring region of planetesimals and is not a satellite. it has to have sufficient mass to overcome its compressive strength and achieve hydrostatic equilibrium. It should not be confused with a minor planet.
Hydrostatic resistance is another term of hydrostatic pressure. This is the pressure exerted by a fluid due to the force of gravity. This increases with depth because of the increasing weight of the fluid above a certain point.
The definition of "planet" set in 2006 by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) states that in the Solar System a planet is a celestial body that: # is in orbit around the Sun, # has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape), and # has "cleared the neighborhood" around its orbit.
According to the 2006 definition from the International Astronomical Union, there are three main requirements:it is a celestial object which orbits the Sun (or in the case of exo-planets, orbits another star);it is massive enough so that its own gravity can overcome rigid-body forces and attain a hydrostatic equilibrium shape. That is, it is approximately spherical;it has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
According to the IAU's definition:A "planet" is a celestial body that(a) is in orbit around the Sun,(b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and(c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
Asteroids are not round primarily due to their relatively small size and insufficient gravitational force. Unlike larger celestial bodies, which have enough gravity to pull themselves into a spherical shape, many asteroids are irregularly shaped because their mass is too low to achieve hydrostatic equilibrium. Additionally, their formation process and collisions with other objects contribute to their uneven surfaces and varied shapes.
According to the IAU's definition of a planet:"A planet is a celestial body that: (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighborhood round its orbit."This specific definition doesn't specify that a planet needs to have satellites in orbit around it. So Mercury and Venus are planets though they don't have moons.
I assume you're asking about the criteria for being a "planet" as opposed to a "dwarf planet": In the Solar System, these boil down to: 1. is in orbit about the Sun Yes, Pluto orbits the Sun (or at least the barycenter of the Solar System as a whole, which is probably a better definition) 2. is in hydrostatic equilibrium True as far as we can tell, and we don't have any reason to believe it's NOT in hydrostatic equilibrium, since it's larger and more massive than several other objects that we know are in hydrostatic equilibrium. (By the way, in layman's terms, "hydrostatic equilibrium" = "more or less spherical".) 3. has "cleared the neighborhood" around its orbit. Pluto massively fails this one, since its orbit crosses Neptune's. This is the controversial part of the definition, by the way: has Neptune not "cleared its orbit" because of Pluto? Has Jupiter not "cleared its orbit" because of the Trojan asteroids? It basically comes down to "if your orbit crosses that of a body significantly larger than yourself, you're not a planet." It originally made sense to call Pluto a planet, because we thought it was a lot bigger than it turns out to actually be (As late as the early 1970s, you can find estimates of Pluto's size indicating that it was thought to be at least the size of Mars, and possibly as large as Earth.) We now know that not only is Pluto considerably smaller than the Moon, there are bodies of approximately the same size, or even larger, out there in roughly similar orbits. So it really makes sense to recategorize it as something similar to a large asteroid, such as Ceres, which is in fact what the IAU has done.
In the context of celestial bodies, "orbit" refers to the path that a celestial body follows around another body due to gravity, such as a planet orbiting a star. On the other hand, "orbital" refers to the specific region in space where an object, like a satellite or spacecraft, moves around a celestial body, following a specific trajectory.
celestial globe is a physical model of celestial sphere
A planet has to be in orbit around the sun. It also has to be more or less spherical in shape, having a high enough mass and therefore gravity to achieve this 'hydrostatic equilibrium'. Thirdly, it has to have cleared it's orbit of most other matter - it has to dominate it's orbit, be the only main body at that particular distance from the sun.