I assume you're asking about the criteria for being a "planet" as opposed to a "dwarf planet":
In the Solar System, these boil down to:
1. is in orbit about the Sun
Yes, Pluto orbits the Sun (or at least the barycenter of the Solar System as a whole, which is probably a better definition)
2. is in hydrostatic equilibrium
True as far as we can tell, and we don't have any reason to believe it's NOT in hydrostatic equilibrium, since it's larger and more massive than several other objects that we know are in hydrostatic equilibrium. (By the way, in layman's terms, "hydrostatic equilibrium" = "more or less spherical".)
3. has "cleared the neighborhood" around its orbit.
Pluto massively fails this one, since its orbit crosses Neptune's. This is the controversial part of the definition, by the way: has Neptune not "cleared its orbit" because of Pluto? Has Jupiter not "cleared its orbit" because of the Trojan asteroids? It basically comes down to "if your orbit crosses that of a body significantly larger than yourself, you're not a planet."
It originally made sense to call Pluto a planet, because we thought it was a lot bigger than it turns out to actually be (As late as the early 1970s, you can find estimates of Pluto's size indicating that it was thought to be at least the size of Mars, and possibly as large as Earth.)
We now know that not only is Pluto considerably smaller than the Moon, there are bodies of approximately the same size, or even larger, out there in roughly similar orbits. So it really makes sense to recategorize it as something similar to a large asteroid, such as Ceres, which is in fact what the IAU has done.
Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet in 2006 by the International Astronomical Union because it did not meet all the criteria to be considered a full planet. One of the criteria is that a planet must clear its orbit of other debris, which Pluto did not do.
Pluto lost its status as a planet in 2006 when the International Astronomical Union redefined the criteria for what constitutes a planet. Pluto did not meet the new criteria because it did not clear its orbit of other debris. Instead, it was reclassified as a dwarf planet.
When Pluto was demoted from a planet to a dwarf planet, it failed to meet all three requirements set forth by the International Astronomy Union (IAU) that define what a planet is. As such, according to the IAU, a planet is a celestial body that: 1. Orbits the sun 2. Has enough mass to form into a (nearly) spherical shape 3. Has "cleared the neighbourhood" around its orbit Pluto failed to meet the third criteria.
Pluto was removed from the list of planets in 2006 by the International Astronomical Union, as it did not meet the criteria to be classified as a planet due to its size and orbital characteristics.
In August 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) redefined the criteria for what qualifies as a planet. Pluto did not meet these updated criteria and was therefore reclassified as a "dwarf planet" rather than a full-fledged planet.
Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet in 2006 by the International Astronomical Union because it did not meet all the criteria to be considered a full planet. One of the criteria is that a planet must clear its orbit of other debris, which Pluto did not do.
No, mercury is. Pluto is a dwarf planet because it does not meet all the criteria to be a planet and it is the second largest dwarf planet so far.
Pluto lost its status as a planet in 2006 when the International Astronomical Union redefined the criteria for what constitutes a planet. Pluto did not meet the new criteria because it did not clear its orbit of other debris. Instead, it was reclassified as a dwarf planet.
When Pluto was demoted from a planet to a dwarf planet, it failed to meet all three requirements set forth by the International Astronomy Union (IAU) that define what a planet is. As such, according to the IAU, a planet is a celestial body that: 1. Orbits the sun 2. Has enough mass to form into a (nearly) spherical shape 3. Has "cleared the neighbourhood" around its orbit Pluto failed to meet the third criteria.
Pluto was removed from the list of planets in 2006 by the International Astronomical Union, as it did not meet the criteria to be classified as a planet due to its size and orbital characteristics.
In August 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) redefined the criteria for what qualifies as a planet. Pluto did not meet these updated criteria and was therefore reclassified as a "dwarf planet" rather than a full-fledged planet.
Pluto was excluded from the list of planets in 2006 after the International Astronomical Union (IAU) released it's decision on what defines a planet. In sum, the IAU now defines a planet as being a celestial body within a solar system that: 1. orbits the sun 2. is large enough to form into a round-ish shape 3. has "cleared the neighbourhood" of it's orbit Since Pluto did not meet the third criteria, it can no longer be considered a planet.
Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet on August 24, 2006, by the International Astronomical Union. This decision was made because Pluto did not meet all the criteria necessary to be considered a full-fledged planet.
Pluto is classified as a dwarf planet because it does not meet all three criteria established by the International Astronomical Union for a full-fledged planet: it has not cleared its orbit of other debris.
In 2006, Pluto was reclassified from a planet to a dwarf planet by the International Astronomical Union (IAU). This decision was made because Pluto did not meet all three criteria set by the IAU for a celestial body to be considered a planet.
The decision to classify Pluto as a dwarf planet was based on updated definitions of a planet by the International Astronomical Union in 2006. Pluto did not meet all the criteria for a planet, such as clearing its orbit of debris, hence it was reclassified as a dwarf planet.
Pluto is unable to clear its orbital path of debris.