Evidence for the fission theory of how the moon formed includes the similarities between the isotopic composition of the Earth and the Moon, the Moon's low iron content, and the Moon's synchronous rotation with Earth. Additionally, computer models of the early Solar System dynamics support the fission theory as a plausible explanation for the Moon's formation.
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
Yes, a theory should be supported by evidence in order to be considered valid and credible. Evidence helps to substantiate the claims and predictions made by a theory, allowing for testing, verification, and refinement of the theory as needed.
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
The evidence of cosmic microwave background radiation supports the Big Bang theory.
A lack of evidence would weaken any theory. But the well known asteroids have well defined orbits.
The fission theory is a scientific explanation for the formation of the Moon. It suggests that the Moon was once part of the Earth and broke off due to a massive impact with another celestial body, leading to its formation. This theory is supported by evidence such as the similarities in composition between the Earth and Moon.
The fission theory, the capture theory, the condensation theory, the colliding planetesimals theory and the ejected ring theory.
It's the fission theory, if anyone wants the wrong answer.
Cell Theory
A common theory is a theory which has not been proven or a theory without evidence.
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
Yes, a theory should be supported by evidence in order to be considered valid and credible. Evidence helps to substantiate the claims and predictions made by a theory, allowing for testing, verification, and refinement of the theory as needed.
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
A hypothesis is a statement of theory. Something that is unproven. You gather evidence to support that theory. Gather enough evidence to support and a theory becomes accepted as fact.
Peter P. Fong has written: 'Statistical theory of nuclear fission' -- subject(s): Mathematical statistics, Nuclear fission
If your issues are on the table, then it would be apparent that empirical evidence would trump theory, if the theory on the table were not proven to be true. If the theory were proven to be true, and the empirical evidence does not agree with the theory, then more experimentation would be necessary to determine the validity of the theory.
The evidence of cosmic microwave background radiation supports the Big Bang theory.