The general formula for the combustion of a carbohydrate like starch is C6H12O6 (starch) + 6O2 -> 6CO2 + 6H2O. This represents the chemical reaction when starch is burned in the presence of oxygen, resulting in the formation of carbon dioxide and water.
Yes, starch is combustible. It is a carbohydrate made up of glucose units, and when heated or exposed to a flame, it can ignite and burn, releasing energy. However, the combustion of starch typically requires specific conditions, such as being in a fine powder form and having sufficient oxygen available. In general, like many organic materials, starch can be considered flammable under the right circumstances.
Yes, it is possible to combine starch with sawdust to create a fuel for burning. Starch can act as a binder, helping to compact the sawdust into briquettes or pellets that can burn more efficiently. This mixture can enhance the fuel's energy density and improve its combustion properties. However, the exact formulation and processing methods would need to be optimized for effective use as a fuel source.
The iodine test using a starch ewer is mainly used to detect the presence of starch. It specifically tests for the presence of starch molecules by forming a blue-black color in the presence of starch. It does not differentiate between starch and other carbohydrates.
Carbohydrates are stored as glycogen in the liver and muscles, and excess carbohydrates can also be converted to fat for long-term storage in adipose tissue.
Starch phosphorylase is primarily involved in starch catabolism, breaking down starch molecules into glucose units. It catalyzes the phosphorolytic cleavage of α-1,4 glycosidic bonds in starch. Starch anabolism, on the other hand, involves the synthesis of starch molecules from glucose monomers by enzymes like starch synthase and ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase.
What are the conventional formulae?
There are thousands of mathematical formulae.
Yes, starch is combustible. It is a carbohydrate made up of glucose units, and when heated or exposed to a flame, it can ignite and burn, releasing energy. However, the combustion of starch typically requires specific conditions, such as being in a fine powder form and having sufficient oxygen available. In general, like many organic materials, starch can be considered flammable under the right circumstances.
You will find several formulae in the Wikipedia article on "derivative".
There are different formulae for calculating different kinds of energy.There are different formulae for calculating different kinds of energy.There are different formulae for calculating different kinds of energy.There are different formulae for calculating different kinds of energy.
Different figures have different formulae; here you will find formulae for the areas of some figures: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area#Formulae
Mainly, many magnitudes are related through different kinds of formulae. In advanced science you may have to derive your own formulae, but in more basic science, you just use existing formulae.Mainly, many magnitudes are related through different kinds of formulae. In advanced science you may have to derive your own formulae, but in more basic science, you just use existing formulae.Mainly, many magnitudes are related through different kinds of formulae. In advanced science you may have to derive your own formulae, but in more basic science, you just use existing formulae.Mainly, many magnitudes are related through different kinds of formulae. In advanced science you may have to derive your own formulae, but in more basic science, you just use existing formulae.
The formula for fly ash is primarily silicon dioxide (SiO2), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), and iron oxide (Fe2O3), along with various other minor constituents. Its composition can vary depending on the source material and combustion conditions.
If it isn't a whole number than theres a constant in the formulae
o2
Helium: He
The answer will depend on the shape n question. There are different formulae for some simple shapes, more complicated formulae for complex shapes, and you probably have to estimate for really complicated shapes.The answer will depend on the shape n question. There are different formulae for some simple shapes, more complicated formulae for complex shapes, and you probably have to estimate for really complicated shapes.The answer will depend on the shape n question. There are different formulae for some simple shapes, more complicated formulae for complex shapes, and you probably have to estimate for really complicated shapes.The answer will depend on the shape n question. There are different formulae for some simple shapes, more complicated formulae for complex shapes, and you probably have to estimate for really complicated shapes.