In general, there tend to be more herbivores than carnivores in an ecosystem. This is because herbivores form the base of the food chain, supporting the larger number of carnivores that rely on them for food.
There are more herbivores than carnivores in the Serengeti. This is because the herbivores form the base of the food chain, supporting a larger number of carnivores that prey on them. The abundance of herbivores also supports a diverse ecosystem with various species of grazers and browsers.
If all predators disappeared, the number of herbivores and smaller carnivores will increase in number.
It is the way nature plays out. The carnivores eat the herbivores, so it is impossible to have more carnivores then herbivores. If there are too few herbivores around, the carnivores begin to starve, so for that reason there will always be more herbivores then carnivores. Most carnivores protect there territories from other carnivores, killing them if necessary, because they instinctively know an area can only support so many carnivores based on food supply -- which for them are herbivores. Also many carnivores are capable of practicing birth control to some degree to keep their numbers appropriate for the number of herbivores that can sustain them.
In the Arctic, herbivores generally outnumber carnivores. The primary herbivores in this region include species like caribou, muskoxen, and various migratory birds that feed on vegetation. Carnivores, such as polar bears, Arctic foxes, and wolves, are fewer in number as they rely on herbivores for food. Thus, the ecological balance favors herbivores in this harsh environment.
In general, there tend to be more herbivores than carnivores in an ecosystem. This is because herbivores form the base of the food chain, supporting the larger number of carnivores that rely on them for food.
There are more herbivores than carnivores in the Serengeti. This is because the herbivores form the base of the food chain, supporting a larger number of carnivores that prey on them. The abundance of herbivores also supports a diverse ecosystem with various species of grazers and browsers.
If all predators disappeared, the number of herbivores and smaller carnivores will increase in number.
It is the way nature plays out. The carnivores eat the herbivores, so it is impossible to have more carnivores then herbivores. If there are too few herbivores around, the carnivores begin to starve, so for that reason there will always be more herbivores then carnivores. Most carnivores protect there territories from other carnivores, killing them if necessary, because they instinctively know an area can only support so many carnivores based on food supply -- which for them are herbivores. Also many carnivores are capable of practicing birth control to some degree to keep their numbers appropriate for the number of herbivores that can sustain them.
In the Arctic, herbivores generally outnumber carnivores. The primary herbivores in this region include species like caribou, muskoxen, and various migratory birds that feed on vegetation. Carnivores, such as polar bears, Arctic foxes, and wolves, are fewer in number as they rely on herbivores for food. Thus, the ecological balance favors herbivores in this harsh environment.
carnivores are animals which eat animals while herbivores are animals which eat plant and every one knows that plants are an easy source of food with this herbivores increase in numbers as there is plenty and easy to get food and carnivores stay at a low number as it is difficult to catch there food
Yes, it is possible to construct a pyramid where the number of carnivores exceeds the number of herbivores, particularly in specific ecosystems or food webs. In such scenarios, a high density of carnivores could be supported by factors like abundant prey availability or a limited number of herbivore species. However, this would be atypical in most ecological pyramids, where herbivores generally outnumber carnivores due to energy transfer inefficiencies. Overall, while rare, certain conditions could allow for a carnivore-dominated pyramid.
There are more herbivores than carnivores in ecosystems primarily due to the energy pyramid's structure. Energy transfer between trophic levels is inefficient, with only about 10% of the energy available at one level being passed on to the next. Since herbivores occupy the primary consumer level, they require a larger population to sustain the fewer carnivores that depend on them for energy. Additionally, the vast availability of plant biomass supports a greater number of herbivores in comparison to the limited food resources available for carnivores.
The most dangerous prehistoric species is that of Dinosaurs. The dinosaurs can be carnivores or herbivores. If the carnivores were alive, by now they would have eaten a large number of animals and human beings. Such a carnivore is Velociraptor. The herbivores are no danger for us.
Yes, there is a relationship between the grass and the grasshopper. The insects in question (Caelifera suborder) number among the world's herbivores. They prioritize grasses and grassy plants as preferred food sources.
One carnivore can eat lots of herbivores so the number of predators always has to be lower than the number of prey. If the number of carnivores gets bigger than their prey some will die of starvation and the number will reduce again.
I think there are supposed to be an equal amount as well as plants the herbivores eat. This is to maintain an equilibrium so no side makes the other extinct. I think this holds true to the point of an outside factor. Weather killing a large amount of plants could affect an ecosystem by having a lack of food for the herbivores. They may die off leaving little to no food for the carnivores. I think it's all about equilibrium so there should not be more carnivores than herbivores and vice versa.