There's no scientific name for it
hypothesis
None do. By definition, superstitious beliefs do not have a scientific basis.
There are none. By definition, a supersition does not have a scientific basis.
It is the ability of an organism to reproduce.
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
Is it possible for an operational definition to be valid but not reliable
cheese
no it does not complt with the definition of a cheque and its not a valid negotiable instrument
No, a drawing of an atom is not a scientific definition. A scientific definition of an atom would describe it as the smallest unit of matter that retains the properties of an element.
You needn't a scientific definition for it. Theory is something waiting to be proved in the future that it was not a theory in the past. It was a valid idea. However, if you want to go deeper on this issue, there is a link right below.
no
The scientific definition of purification is, the extraction of one specific substance from a mixture of substances.
Information has been uncovered about the Battle of the Little Bighorn
scientific attitudes together with its definition
There's no scientific name for it
when it is consistent with observation