nucleus controls and regulates the cell and performs cell division.
if the nucleus is removed, the cell is not able to perform well and can't divide.
hence the cell dies off after a very short time.
No.
No, a cell could not live without an endoplasmic reticulum. The endoplasmic reticulum is essential for protein and lipid synthesis, processing, and transport within the cell. Without this organelle, the cell would not be able to properly function and would eventually die.
30 to 50 hrs without oxygen
They don't (or at least not well or for long) - it is needed for cell divsion/growth.
There are no known cells that can live without DNA. DNA contains the genetic information necessary for cellular function, including the production of proteins and the regulation of cell processes. Without DNA, cells would not be able to replicate, maintain their structure, or carry out the essential functions required for survival.
If see practically, no. Because a cell is a living thing that means it has some input and output for surviving. Even if a cell has enough reserves stored to live for a period of time it would die after that; a cell needs some resource to live.
grass we can always live without grass
No.
No
A cell is important because you could not live without them.
A cell can't live if it doesn't exist... Rephrase the question, maybe?
Yes.
The protoplasm of a cell is the colorless material comprising the living part of a cell, including the cytoplasm, nucleus, and other organelles. Without it the cell will not live.
People can not live without human resources, because food and shelter is a human resource, and if we don't have food and shelter, we will die!
The cell will never live. its dead on arrival. Ribosomes synthesize proteins. Without protein the cell cannot survive.
A cell would die without its nucleus as it is its "brain" which controls the cell. Only human red blood cells have no nuclei after maturity.
yes i agree because without a cell we can't live