Coast lines stand to be reduced. Many species are expected to become extinct. The scenic beauty of fast receding glaciers will evaporate. Water sources for folks who depend on glacial melt water will be lost, as will numerous coastal cities.
The end of global warming would help the ozone. It is because the depletion of ozone is directly related to the global warming caused by greenhouse gases.
The opposite of global warming is global cooling, which refers to a decrease in the Earth's average temperature over an extended period of time.
It is difficult to quantify the exact percentage of the Earth that would be saved by stopping global warming completely. However, halting global warming would help protect ecosystems, reduce extreme weather events, and mitigate the threat of sea level rise, benefiting the planet as a whole.
Oil Spills . Global Warming Would Take Longer Than a Oil Spill
The most valid way to study global warming is through history. Scientists observe the past occurances of climate, environment, atmosphere, etc., to understand the way global warming is developing over time. To gain the most insight on global warming, it would be wise to work alongside someone who is studying it themselves. Global warming is simply a matter of tracking trends and analyzing patterns to make inferences. If you are doing this, you are studying global warming,
If you were asked to speak in a debate, "Against man-made Global Warming" you would be arguing that man is not causing Global Warming. You would have to argue that Global Warming is occurring naturally.
Of global warming Mostly by lost of habitat.
no.the global warming won't benefit anyone
The end of global warming would help the ozone. It is because the depletion of ozone is directly related to the global warming caused by greenhouse gases.
No. Global warming is caused by man burning fossil fuels and cutting down forests. No other animal does that. If there were no humans on earth, there would be no global warming.
If global warming affects the ozone hole, the UV will come in. This will lead to more global warming.
No one would want to have global warming being caused by humans. That is not a logical position for anyone. Zero percent would WANT man induced global warming.
Nothing at all.
Global warming would have no affect on the location of the poles.
No, and I'd be delighted if You would Join Me in Asking "Why Are There No Laws Regulating Global Warming?". Bc
No, volcanoes would have nothing to do with global warming in any measurable way. Volcanoes occur for reasons outside of the issues involved with global warming.
global warming!!!!!!