This is impossible, because the producers are all plants and 'suddenly' does not happen when you are talking evolution. Hypothetically, the population would decrease relative to the number of producers that became consumers. By switching sides they would increase the number of consumers and decrease the number of producers, meaning there was not enough food to go around and many consumers would starve.
During the marketing era, consumers became more targeted and segmented by companies. Companies focused on creating strategies to promote products and services to specific consumer segments based on their preferences and behaviors. This era emphasized understanding consumer needs and wants to create tailored marketing campaigns.
Jackson became the capital of Mississippi in 1821.
It was in July 20, 1871 that British Columbia became a province of the dominion of Canada.
all animals depends upon plants directly or indirectly for food and oxygen <><><> Above is correct. Carnivores eat other animals- which eat plants. No plants, no food animals, no carnivores. No plants, no oxygen, no carnivores.
If all primary consumers became extinct, there would be a ripple effect through the food chain. This would lead to an increase in the population of primary producers, as there would be less pressure from herbivores. However, it could also disrupt the balance of the ecosystem and impact other organisms that depend on primary consumers for food.
Well, that is kinda hard to explain. Because, a prey can be a predator, and a predator can be a prey. That is because of food chains. For an example, a small fish might eat a plankton, and a squid might eat the fish, and a octopus might eat the squid, and a shark would eat the octopus, and a fishermen might kill and eat the shark. The small fish was a predator that ate the plankton, but then the fish became a prey, because the squid ate it. It is impossible for a animal to be JUST a prey/predator unless they don't eat animals.
So will everything else.
the consumers will die if producers became extinct
If all primary consumers were to become extinct, it would disrupt the food chain as there would be no animals to consume producers (plants). This could potentially lead to overgrowth of plant populations, depletion of resources, and a subsequent decrease in biodiversity as many predator species depend on primary consumers for food.
This is impossible, because the producers are all plants and 'suddenly' does not happen when you are talking evolution. Hypothetically, the population would decrease relative to the number of producers that became consumers. By switching sides they would increase the number of consumers and decrease the number of producers, meaning there was not enough food to go around and many consumers would starve.
He posted videos on youtube and producers liked him and thought he would be a star
American started to focus on customer needs after World War II. The balance of power shifted away from producers to customers. The reason was more intense competition, which gave consumers more choices. Under those circumstances, meeting customer needs became an imperative for business success.
man was never a food producer. plants are the primary producers of our ecosystem
If Earth's net radiation budget became unbalanced, it could lead to changes in the planet's temperature and climate. If incoming solar radiation exceeds outgoing heat radiation, Earth would warm, potentially causing global warming and climate change. Conversely, if outgoing heat radiation exceeds incoming solar radiation, Earth would cool, possibly leading to a global cooling event.
"Lenny, Penny, and Kenny" was the proposed title for the show that became The Big Bang Theory.
Many industries began with a single entrepreneur who thought consumers would buy his product. He quit his job and became an entrepreneur in microbrewing, where his beers soon became popular.