If all of the primary consumers became extinct then anything above that tier would also become extinct. However the producers would thrive.
If all primary consumers were to become extinct, it would disrupt the food chain as there would be no animals to consume producers (plants). This could potentially lead to overgrowth of plant populations, depletion of resources, and a subsequent decrease in biodiversity as many predator species depend on primary consumers for food.
The difference between them is that Primary effects happen during the earthquake e.g. Casualties, Damage to parking structures & free ways. But with Secondary effects they happen after an earthquake e.g. Fire, Landslides & Liquefaction
Primary effects are things that happen straight away as soon as the earthquake hits, such as; buildings shake/collapse (depending on how strong the earthquake is) roads crack/fall in, gas and water systems/poles break/burst
Secondary succession happens more frequently than primary succession because the disruption to the environment is usually less severe in secondary succession, making it easier for organisms to recolonize the area. Additionally, the soil in secondary succession is usually already present, allowing for quicker establishment of plant life. This results in a faster and more common occurrence of secondary succession compared to primary succession.
If the sun were to become larger, Earth would receive more energy, causing temperatures to increase globally. This could lead to more extreme weather events, melting of ice caps, and disruptions to ecosystems due to the rise in temperature.
If there were more secondary consumers than primary consumer, then the primary consumers may not be able to find food to survive and become extinct. With too many secondary consumers as a result of no predators of them, then all of the plants may become extinct as well, causing the whole food chain to die out.
If all primary consumers were to become extinct, it would disrupt the food chain as there would be no animals to consume producers (plants). This could potentially lead to overgrowth of plant populations, depletion of resources, and a subsequent decrease in biodiversity as many predator species depend on primary consumers for food.
What would happen if grasses and shrubs were removed from an ecosystem? A.the primary consumers would increaseB.the primary consumers would become secondary consumersC.the primary consumers would die out or move elsewhereD.the primary consumers would stay unchanged
You mom will disappear
Then ducks will rule the world.
FHRITP
nothing
It would be extinct. As in no longer in existence. It would not be here anymore.
There will be no more elephants. Boo
bullfighters would be out of a job
nothing
then you would not even be here