Because all the material that could rekindle it has run out - there is none left.
no it doesnt gain mass at allIt can change the bio mass. But cannot change the mass of earth as it uses resources within earth
It doesnt fack you
High, typically 10 to 70 times (or more) the mass of our own sun.
High mass stars have a faster rate of burning compared to low mass stars. This is because high mass stars have more gravitational pressure in their cores, leading to faster nuclear reactions and higher energy output. This results in a shorter lifespan for high mass stars compared to low mass stars.
There is no direct relationship between length and mass.
Stars don't "burn" chemically like a fire. The energy they release is obtained by fusing light elements into heavier elements. In doing that they convert mass into energy as Einstein described with the equation E=mc2. A high mass star explodes as a supernova, leaving behind a neutron star or a black hole. Neither of those is capable of nuclear fusion.
It seems there are three options: a white dwarf, a neutron star, or a black hole. Which of the three will occur depends on the remaining mass of the star.
It doesnt. Law of Conservation of Mass.
mass
High mass.
High mass.
no it doesnt gain mass at allIt can change the bio mass. But cannot change the mass of earth as it uses resources within earth
kindly restate your question. it doesnt makes sense
the mass remains the same.
It doesnt fack you
high mass has shortest life (stars right?)
non matter,it doue not have mass and doesnt occcupt a space