0
Scientists accept an idea as true when it is supported by substantial empirical evidence and rigorously tested through repeatable experiments and observations. The idea must also withstand peer review and scrutiny from the scientific community. Additionally, it should be consistent with existing knowledge and theories, or provide a compelling explanation for phenomena that cannot be accounted for by current understanding. Ultimately, scientific acceptance is provisional, subject to revision as new evidence emerges.
What else can I help you with?
When do scientist accept an idea as being true?
Scientists accept an idea as true when it is supported by a substantial body of evidence gathered through rigorous experimentation and observation. This evidence must withstand critical scrutiny, replicability, and peer review, ensuring that the findings are reliable and not based on chance or bias. Additionally, the idea should be able to make accurate predictions and be consistent with existing scientific knowledge. Ultimately, scientific acceptance is a dynamic process, subject to change as new evidence emerges.
A person using logical reasoning will only accept an idea after:?
A person using logical reasoning will only accept an idea after they get the true facts. This is a simple question. Following a specific method that relies on certain facts or assumptions.
Why did scientists in 1915 not accept wegeners idea of continental drift?
Scientists in 1915 did not accept Alfred Wegener's idea of continental drift because he lacked a plausible mechanism for how the continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's ideas were seen as radical and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs of the time, so there was resistance to accepting his theory without more concrete evidence. The technology available at the time also did not provide the necessary tools to support Wegener's hypothesis.
Scientists come from a variety of cultures and backgrounds.?
True.
How close are the scientists to coming up with answer for global warming?
i have no idea x
Is it true or false the Scientists accept ideas from the past but will revise them when new evidence is discovered?
true
When do scientist accept an idea as being true?
Scientists accept an idea as true when it is supported by a substantial body of evidence gathered through rigorous experimentation and observation. This evidence must withstand critical scrutiny, replicability, and peer review, ensuring that the findings are reliable and not based on chance or bias. Additionally, the idea should be able to make accurate predictions and be consistent with existing scientific knowledge. Ultimately, scientific acceptance is a dynamic process, subject to change as new evidence emerges.
When do sccientist accept an idea as true?
When it's been proven - by research and testing with sample data.
Scientists have only come to accept and use the scientific method in the last 3 or 4 years true or false?
False
When does scientist accept an idea as true?
Never. The scientific method precludes this. One can only say that an Idea has not yet been superseded by a better one.
Weather maps are idea models that allow scientists to predict weather patterns true or false?
True. Weather maps are used by scientists to analyze atmospheric conditions and make predictions about weather patterns. By studying factors such as temperature, pressure, and wind patterns on these maps, scientists can better understand and forecast changes in weather.
Why is it important that scientist know and accept their limitations?
why is it important that scientists know and accept their limitations?
When would scientists accept a theory?
probably when you can prove it
Is it true that all scientists are ecologists?
No, it is not true.
A person using logical reasoning will only accept an idea after:?
A person using logical reasoning will only accept an idea after they get the true facts. This is a simple question. Following a specific method that relies on certain facts or assumptions.
Do you think it's wise for scientists not to accept a theory immediately even if the theory has a lot of evidence to support it?
Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
Why did scientists in 1915 not accept wegeners idea of continental drift?
Scientists in 1915 did not accept Alfred Wegener's idea of continental drift because he lacked a plausible mechanism for how the continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's ideas were seen as radical and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs of the time, so there was resistance to accepting his theory without more concrete evidence. The technology available at the time also did not provide the necessary tools to support Wegener's hypothesis.
