There is a law of exchange. When two things come in contact with each other, they are said to exchange the material. You have to see for the same. Also that, you can not see, what you do not know. The expert will be able to collect the circumstantial evidence from the spot of the crime. The hardcore criminal also leaves sufficient evidence to catch him. You have to be a keen observer to find the evidence. The criminal has almost always left, enough evidences to incriminate him. What seems unimportant to you may be very important to the forensic expert. That is not necessary to collect 'All' the evidences left by the criminal. That is not possible and not required also.
Because all of our knowledge of the past is based of of their evidence and damaging anything not only is equivalent to the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars, it is also a irretrievable loss of knowledge. Furthermore, carelessness may result in misinterpretation of the evidence and/or contamination of the evidence which is even worse than loss, as it may cause incorrect conclusions to be drawn.
Yes, suspects who flee from officers and discard evidence may be arrested because the act of discarding evidence can be perceived as an attempt to obstruct justice or hide incriminating information. The abandoned evidence may also provide probable cause for the suspect's arrest if it is directly linked to criminal activity.
yes it s an evidence that a chemical change has been occurred
Non
Because there is little or none of it.
You would find evidence
If you are being charged with a crime, by the State, then yes, they will look for evidence. There may be a ton of evidence, or there may just be a little. Either way, they are likely to find it.
A grammatical mistake. It is meant to say "anecdotal evidence" which is evidence that may be true but could be unreliable and may or may not lead to the desired conclusion. It is as opposed to "scientific evidence" which may be held as reliable.
A body of evidence would include all of the evidence of a particular trial. It may be physical evidence or it may be circumstantial evidence or a combination of both.
not exactly but greek stories MAY link to where u can find evidense of minotaur.
because if you are looking for evidence and you find a finger print it may help you crack the case. Because every finger print is diffrent and if they find your fingerprint they would no i is yours. You leave a fingerprint on every surface.
What evidence did the archaeologist find to suggest that the Tainos existed
A grammatical mistake. It is meant to say "anecdotal evidence" which is evidence that may be true but could be unreliable and may or may not lead to the desired conclusion. It is as opposed to "scientific evidence" which may be held as reliable.
Well..., on the internet in books what kind of evidence
look for evidence that's what it means
Barbers are not regulated in the UK, however you may find it hard to find customers without evidence of experience or qualification.
yes the police can do wht they want