0
What else can I help you with?
Which scientists work provided evidence of moving continents making the continental drift theory accepted by the scientific community?
Henry Hess
What is the evidence against continental drift?
Some scientists initially doubted the theory of continental drift due to a lack of plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, the scientific community was initially resistant to the idea proposed by Alfred Wegener, as it challenged existing geological paradigms. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s that continental drift gained widespread acceptance in the scientific community.
Why did most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift?
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
Why were other scientists unwilling to accept Wegner's ideas?
One reason the scientific community doubted him was because he wasn't able to come up with an explanation for how the continents were moving, & where the force to move them was coming from.
Why was wegeners theory so different?
Wegener's theory of continental drift was different because it proposed that continents were once joined together in a supercontinent called Pangaea and drifted apart over time. This was a radical idea at the time as it challenged the established belief of stationary continents. Wegener lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents moved, which led to skepticism from the scientific community until the development of plate tectonics theory.
Which scientists work provided evidence of moving continents making the continental drift theory accepted by the scientific community?
Henry Hess
What is the evidence against continental drift?
Some scientists initially doubted the theory of continental drift due to a lack of plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, the scientific community was initially resistant to the idea proposed by Alfred Wegener, as it challenged existing geological paradigms. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s that continental drift gained widespread acceptance in the scientific community.
How with so much evidence to support continental drift how could scientists reject the idea?
Some scientists rejected the idea of continental drift because Alfred Wegener, who proposed the theory, lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. In addition, the scientific community at the time held onto the prevailing belief in static continents and were resistant to accepting a new paradigm. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s that continental drift became widely accepted.
Why was wegners continental drift hypothesis rejected by the scientific community?
because he couldn't explain what forces caused the continents to move... :D yup that's why
Why were Wegener's ideas not immediately accepted by the scientific community?
Wegener's ideas of continental drift were not immediately accepted by the scientific community because he did not have a satisfactory explanation for the mechanism that could move continents. Additionally, his hypothesis was contrary to the prevailing scientific beliefs at the time, which focused on fixed continents and seafloor spreading. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained wider acceptance.
Why did most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift?
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
Why were other scientists unwilling to accept Wegner's ideas?
One reason the scientific community doubted him was because he wasn't able to come up with an explanation for how the continents were moving, & where the force to move them was coming from.
Why was wegeners theory so different?
Wegener's theory of continental drift was different because it proposed that continents were once joined together in a supercontinent called Pangaea and drifted apart over time. This was a radical idea at the time as it challenged the established belief of stationary continents. Wegener lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents moved, which led to skepticism from the scientific community until the development of plate tectonics theory.
Why was the hypothesis of continental drift rejected when it was proposed by wegener?
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was rejected because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how the continents moved. Additionally, the scientific community at the time did not have sufficient evidence to support the idea of continents drifting. It wasn't until the theory of plate tectonics emerged later, providing a mechanism and supporting evidence, that continental drift became widely accepted.
What two aspects of Wegener's continental drift hypothesis did most Earth scientists object?
The two aspects of Weneger's continental drift hypothesis were objectionable to most Earth Scientist were. One, that gravitational forces of the moon and sun cause the earth's tides and also the movement of continents across the globe. Also, that larger and sturdier continents broke through thinner oceanic crust. Not 100% sure, but thats what my book says.
How do scientists share their with scientific community?
They speak at conferences and write articles.
What is the weakness in Wegener's continental drift hypothesis?
A weakness in Wegener's continental drift hypothesis was the lack of a mechanism explaining how the continents moved. Additionally, he was unable to provide evidence supporting the force that would be strong enough to move continents across the Earth's surface. Lastly, Wegener's theory faced skepticism from the scientific community at the time due to a lack of detailed data and observations supporting his idea of continental drift.
