answersLogoWhite

0

The most prominent example of a theory of the universe being incorrect is the Ptolemaic model. This model developed by the Greek astronomer Ptolemy in the 2nd century held that the Earth was the center of the universe and that all other celestial bodies revolved around it. This model was later disproven by Nicolaus Copernicus in the 16th century who proposed that the Sun was the center of the universe not the Earth.

The Ptolemaic model also stated that the planets stars and the Sun revolve around the Earth in circular orbits. This is contrary to modern scientific understanding which states that the planets and stars move in elliptical orbits.

User Avatar

Jaunita Hand

Lvl 13
2y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

Whose theory of the universe was held as law for thousands of years even though the theory was falsified?

The Ptolemaic theory of the planets was believed to be right for 1400 years until Copernicus suggested that the Sun might be at the centre and not the Earth. Although Copernicus's theory was not correct, is was soon replaced by Kepler's theory which has been supported by further scientific discoveries throughout the 400 years since it was published.


Is there a loophole in big bang theory?

It is important to first realize that the big bang theory is a theory; it is not a physical law on its own for which there might be loopholes. However, I think (correct me if I am wrong though), that you are referring to the idea that the big bang theory states that the Universe started with a bang which just came into being out of nothing. This is not entirely correct, the big bang theory does not implicitly say that the Universe came into being at some point; it only says that in the distant past the Universe was very small and that it has been expanding ever since. This statement is well verified by observations and measurements. It does not claim or explain how the Universe came into being. It might sound reasonable that the Universe somehow came into being as a point, and it would fit with the above statements, but the creation of the Universe itself is not yet something that science can say much about. There are models, such as string theory, that sometimes have things to say about this, but they are far from testable at this stage. So, yes, it is possible that something else happened before the Universe became tiny and started to expand, and it wouldn't contradict with the big bang theory at all.


What is the difference between oscillating universe to big bang theory?

The Big Bang Theory holds that our present Universe was, about thirteen billion years ago, in an extremely more dense state and has been expanding from that ever since. A sub-set of that theory is that our Universe has gone through an infinite series of expansions: each of which lead to a gravitationally induced end to the expansion, then a collapse of the Universe into a state of extreme density, and then another expansion. This is called the "Oscillating Universe" Hypothesis The latest observations make the latter idea very unlikely, as our present Universe will almost certainly never cease its expansion. Either we are in the first oscillation of the Universe that failed to stop its expansion, or there were no oscillations prior to this one at all. Unless later observations show that our present conclusions are wrong, there will no oscillations after this Universe. It is difficult to imagine how we could ever determine if our Universe was the first oscillation that failed to end its expansion or if there were simply no oscillations prior to this expansion at all.


Why did not universe made single after Big Bang?

No one knows exactly why the universe was not made single after the Big Bang. The Big Bang is actually only a single theory on the creation of the universe and is not considered to be scientific fact.Comments: 1) Maybe it's just me, but I don't really understand this question. 2) The Big Bang Theory is, at present, accepted as "scientific fact".Of course, like all scientific theories, it could be proved wrong in the future.


Why did catholic church leaders oppose Galileo's sun centered model of the universe?

The Bible is written from an implicitly geocentric viewpoint, so if we take the Bible as the ultimate authority on everything, then it would be wrong to come to other conclusions such as the heliocentric theory, merely by observing the way the universe actually is. Incidentally, although Galileo did support the heliocentric theory, it was originally proposed by Copernicus. It isn't Galileo's model. Galileo did contribute to this theory with his astronomical observations, however.

Related Questions

Whose theory of the universe was law for thousands of years even though it was wrong?

could you re-phrase that? do you mean who came up with the initial theory of the universe and it's evolution? if so, to claim it was/is wrong is very relative. no matter how you look at it the universe is almost all theoretical Physics.


Whose theory of the universe was held for thousand of year but was wrong?

Claudius Ptolemy's (wrong) theory with the Earth at the center of the universe lasted for more than 1000 years


Whose theory of the universe was held as a law for thousands of years even though he was wrong?

Ptolemy's geocentric model was used for over 1500 years.


Who had the first theory of the universe even though they were wrong?

Claudius Ptolemy


Who theory of the universe was held as law for thousands of years even though you were wrong?

me


Who is theory of the universe was held for thousands of years even though you were wrong?

Plato's Theory of Astronomical Convulsion


Whose theory was wrong about the universe?

Everyone who's ever had a theory has been wrong in some way; it's just we don't know if the current one is wrong yet. This is called the Scientific Method.


Who's theory of the universe was held as a law for thousands of years even though they were wrong?

The answer is Tomas Delong


Who theory of the universe was held for law for thousands of years even though he was wrong?

Aristotle if thats how you spell it :)


Who had a theory of the law of the universe but was wrong?

Lots of people have wrong theories about the Universe.


Whos theory of the universe was held as a law for thousands of years even though he was wrong?

Aristotle if thats how you spell it :)


Whose theory of the universe was held as law for a thousand years even though it was wrong?

The Ptolemaic theory of the planets lasted 1400 years, and it lasted so long because it was not very wrong. But when Galileo discovered all the phases of Venus, the theory's days were numbered. This did not happen until Galileo came along with his telescope to study the night sky.