The pin heads on common pins are larger and thus makes the reading more accurate when doing a reflection of light experiment.
Diamond (which is crystalline carbon). Moissanite is an SiC that challenges diamond in many respects, and since the synthetic version comes off patent in 3 or 4 years, it will be expected to be a much more common material, particularly in larger sizes. It has a higher refractive index than diamond.
Not necessarily.
No, they do not. The angular resolution of a telescope is determined by the wavelength of the radiation it is measuring and its diameter. Since optical telescopes detect shorter wavelengths than radio telescopes, they generally have better angular resolution for viewing fine details.
Oh, dude, that's like saying eating pizza is better with toppings than without. I mean, technically, natural light has a shorter wavelength which can provide better resolution in an optical microscope compared to artificial light. But hey, if you're cool with blurry images, go ahead and use that artificial light, no judgment here.
Yes, that's correct. The longer wavelengths of radio waves mean that radio telescopes have poorer angular resolution compared to optical telescopes. This is because resolving power is inversely proportional to the wavelength of the electromagnetic waves being observed.
Common pins are better than optical pins for finding the angle of incidence because they provide a more accurate and precise measurement due to their physical design and direct contact with the surface. Optical pins rely on visual alignment, which can introduce errors and inaccuracies in measurement compared to common pins.
The pin heads on common pins are larger and thus makes the reading more accurate when doing a reflection of light experiment.
They don't. All earth bound telescopes, optical or not, must deal with a number of issues. But what do you mean by "better"? A radio telescope is better suited to pick up radio waves than an optical telescope, but an optical telescope is better for visible light. They each serve their purpose better than the other.
Optical zoom is way better than digital zoom as digital only expands the picture. Optical zoom actually zooms in.
submarine cable
Yes. But your computer needs to be properly configured for a SATA optical drive. Also, a SATA drive is better than a IDE drive.
The optical cable would be the best choice.
They are about equal in quality. Far better than the analog hookup.
If you use an optical zoom, you can take pictures without getting really close to things. An optical zoom is better than a digital zoom, because an optical zoom does not cause pictures to be pixely or grainy, and digital zooms often do.
The bowling ball is better for knocking down pins because it is larger and alson has a larger mass
Because your ugly and I know it and you know it too
Generally an optical mouse provides much better function than an older ball design mouse. The lack of an internal ball to move the mouse reduces the need for cleaning and build up do to the ball itself wearing down.