They don't have to cope with the problems of light pollution, scattering, distortion, and twinkling caused by air, its movement, and particulates suspended in it.
Ground-based telescopes are typically larger and more cost-effective than space telescopes. They can be easily upgraded and repaired, and have the ability to be built in remote locations for better viewing conditions. Additionally, ground-based telescopes benefit from continuous improvements in technology and instrumentation.
Observations from Earth-based telescopes are obscured by the atmosphere.
Telescopes like Hubble produce more detailed images than Earth-based telescopes because they are positioned above Earth's atmosphere, which can distort and blur images. This allows Hubble to capture sharper and clearer images of celestial objects. Additionally, Hubble's location in space enables it to observe wavelengths of light that are absorbed by Earth's atmosphere.
Optical space telescopes are not affected by atmospheric turbulence, which can distort images and limit the clarity of ground-based telescopes. Additionally, they can be positioned above the Earth's atmosphere, avoiding interference from light pollution and atmospheric absorption. This allows them to capture clearer and more detailed images of distant objects in space.
Radio telescopes and infra-red telescopes operate at longer wavelengths/lower frequencies than visible light. Ultraviolet telescopes operate at shorter wavelengths/higher frequencies than visible light.
They must be launched in to space because there is a better veiw in space than from earth.
Yes. The atmosphere interferes for observations.
The Hubble Space Telescope is better than other telescopes because it is located in space, above Earth's atmosphere, which eliminates distortion caused by atmospheric turbulence. This allows for higher image resolution and clarity. Hubble also has a wide range of observational capabilities, including imaging in ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared light.
Ground-based telescopes are typically larger and more cost-effective than space telescopes. They can be easily upgraded and repaired, and have the ability to be built in remote locations for better viewing conditions. Additionally, ground-based telescopes benefit from continuous improvements in technology and instrumentation.
Since the Hubble Telescope is in space, it avoids interference from the atmosphere.
Simply because the HST is in space - it doesn't get affected by the Earth's atmosphere or light pollution - as ground-based telescopes do. Therefore the images it produces are much more detailed.
Observations from Earth-based telescopes are obscured by the atmosphere.
They don't. All earth bound telescopes, optical or not, must deal with a number of issues. But what do you mean by "better"? A radio telescope is better suited to pick up radio waves than an optical telescope, but an optical telescope is better for visible light. They each serve their purpose better than the other.
It is speacial because It can observe the heavans much better than ground telescopes. It is also the largest and most versatile space telescope
The Hubble Space Telescope is not affected by atmospheric distortion, providing clearer images than ground-based telescopes. Ground-based telescopes have the advantage of being easier to upgrade and maintain than a space-based telescope like the Hubble.
The Hubble Space Telescope is above Earth's atmosphere, which distorts and blurs light, giving it a clearer view of the universe. Terrestrial telescopes have to peer through the atmosphere, which can affect image quality with distortion and light pollution. Hubble's position in space allows it to capture sharper and more detailed images than telescopes on Earth.
They have many other different types of telescopes than just reflecting!!!! I have a refracting telescope myself. They also have other things like binoculars and microscopes