Observations from Earth-based telescopes are obscured by the atmosphere.
That the earth revolves around the sun and the moon revolves around earth
It's true that there is no atmosphere on the moon, so studying the stars with a telescope would in some ways be better as there would no atmospheric effects that you would get from earth based telescopes. It's debatable whether it would be better overall though as it would be rather impractical to put such a lab on the moon.
Galileo Galilei constructed telescopes to conduct his observations. He also disproved the Ptolemaic model.
No, they cannot. Only a little over 50% of the moon's surface can be observed from earth, and observations must be made over a period of about 15 years in order to observe the maximum amount of surface.
The moon would make an excellent observatory due to its lack of atmosphere, which allows for unobstructed views of space and minimizes atmospheric distortion that can hinder observations from Earth. Its far side is shielded from Earth's radio noise, making it ideal for radio astronomy. Additionally, the moon's stable surface provides a solid foundation for large telescopes, enabling advanced astronomical research and observation of celestial phenomena without the interference found on Earth.
The craters on Earth's moon were discovered by famous astronomers like Galileo Galilei and Giovanni Cassini in the 17th century. Their observations through telescopes revealed the presence of these impact features on the lunar surface.
That the earth revolves around the sun and the moon revolves around earth
It's true that there is no atmosphere on the moon, so studying the stars with a telescope would in some ways be better as there would no atmospheric effects that you would get from earth based telescopes. It's debatable whether it would be better overall though as it would be rather impractical to put such a lab on the moon.
Galileo Galilei constructed telescopes to conduct his observations. He also disproved the Ptolemaic model.
No, they cannot. Only a little over 50% of the moon's surface can be observed from earth, and observations must be made over a period of about 15 years in order to observe the maximum amount of surface.
A telescope is commonly used to view the moon from Earth. Telescopes gather and focus light to magnify distant objects, allowing astronomers and enthusiasts to see details of the moon's surface.
No you can not see the moon landing sites with your naked eye from earth.
Yes, the existence of the moon can be confirmed through observations made with telescopes and even with the naked eye. Its gravitational influence on Earth, causing tides, and various spacecraft missions that have flown to and orbited the moon also provide evidence of its existence.
Scientists learn about the Moon through observations made from telescopes, spacecraft, and rovers. They also study lunar samples brought back from the Apollo missions as well as data collected from experiments and instruments deployed on the Moon's surface. By combining these sources of information, scientists can investigate the Moon's geology, composition, and history.
One of the main reasons why there is a push to construct a base on the moon is because telescopic observations from the moon would be clearer due to the fact that there would be no interference from an atmosphere, as is experienced on the Earth.AnswerMoon AnswerThe heavy mirror in a large telescope becomes distorted in a gravitational field when fixed on the earth, which would happen even on the moon with its reduced gravity. This reduces the quality of the image. Actuators placed under the mirror are used to minimise this effect in some large modern telescopes (called active optics, see reference). However, orbiting the earth in space the telescope mirror becomes weightless and these effects can be virtually eliminated. This simplifies the telescope design and the subsequent image quality should be improved.An orbiting telescope would also be cheaper to launch and service than one located on the Moon.
a moon based telescope would be better because on the moon there is no wind nor weather so it would be perfect to capture images without worrying about any obstacles.on earth we worry about clouds winds and altitude etc etc.to sum it all up then....... the reason moon-based telescopes are easier to see through is because the moon doesn't have as much obstructions like weather, clouds, pollution, weather, pretty much nuthin.
We infer that the moon revolves around the Earth based on observations and understanding of the laws of physics, such as Newton's law of universal gravitation. The gravitational pull between the Earth and the moon causes the moon to orbit around the Earth in a predictable pattern. This motion can be observed through careful measurements and tracking of the moon's position in the sky.