Standards of mass are essential for ensuring consistency and accuracy in measurements across various industries, science, and trade. They provide a common reference that facilitates fair exchange and comparison of goods, enabling effective communication and collaboration globally. Additionally, precise mass standards are crucial for scientific research and experimentation, ensuring reliable data and reproducibility of results. Overall, these standards promote trust and efficiency in economic and scientific activities.
No, it is not necessary.
Standards are important because they provide a consistent and reliable basis for comparing measurements across different places and times. They help ensure accuracy, precision, and universality in measurements of length, time, and mass. By having agreed-upon standards, we can communicate and collaborate effectively in various fields, such as science, engineering, and trade.
This is necessary in analytical chemistry, to obtain correct results.
Taring the balance is necessary when measuring the mass of a liquid to ensure that only the mass of the liquid is recorded, excluding the weight of the container holding it. By zeroing the balance with the container, you eliminate any potential discrepancies caused by the container's mass, leading to a more accurate and reliable measurement of the liquid itself. This step is essential for precise scientific experiments and calculations.
You need to know the atomic # or the masses of each isotope of the element.
Altered standards of care
No, it is not necessary.
Type your answer here... why is it necessary to quantify measuring?
Necessary standard of conduct and dress are often explained in the code of conduct.
The mass of Avogadro's number of Carbon-12 atoms, which exactly equals 12.000
the definition of density is the amount of mass contained in a set volumeto find density one must know mass and volume the equation is as follows: density= mass/volume hence, weight is not necessary to find density
It is necessary to standardize a solution of NaOH using a primary standard like KHP because primary standards are highly pure and have a known exact mass. This allows for accurate and precise determination of the concentration of the NaOH solution, ensuring reliable and consistent results in experiments.
No, many objects have no mass (at least no mass that is part of the body concerned) at their centre of mass. Not ,necessarily. Center of mass is an imaginary point.(at least no mass that is part of the body concerned)
necessary evil
The mass is volume x density; so it is necessary to know the density of this liquid.
yes
Because it isn't unnecessary