0
What else can I help you with?
How can global warming kill people?
Realistically, global warming is a needed event. Without this warming we would be dead. The concept of man contributing is different. The warming we have seen of of over 0.2 degrees since 1934 has been blamed on man by many political groups that ignore the fact the planet has been warming for 10,000 years.0.2 degrees of warming is not going to kill people. There is no evidence of an increase in storms. Polar bears are not dieing because of the weather and much of the horror stories you hear about the issue are pretty much that, stories.A:It is difficult to attribute specific deaths to global warming. As glaciers vanish, it seems likely deaths will result from the loss of rivers that serve as drinking water. Global warming will cause (and may already have caused) intensified storm activity, but it is beyond our capability to attribute any specific storm to global warming. Sea level rise is a serious concern, but it will likely take decades for ocean levels rising as a result of ocean warming to affect more than small, low-lying mid-ocean islands. Droughts and heatwaves are difficult to specifically attribute to global warming, but will intensify in some areas and those can lead to deaths.
What does David Suzuki say about people who think there is no global warming?
In 2016 David Suzuki said that the former Prime Minister of Canada, Stephen Harper, should be imprisoned for his "willful blindness" regarding man-made global warming. He said: "If you're the CEO of a company and you deliberately avoid or ignore information relevant to the functioning of that company, you can be thrown in jail … " "And to have a Prime Minister who for nine years wouldn't even let the term 'climate change' pass his lips! If that isn't willful blindness, then I don't know what is."
A contibuting factor to global warming?
One contributing factor to global warming is the increase in greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels and deforestation. These gases trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere, leading to rising temperatures and other climate changes. Reducing these emissions is essential to combat global warming.
Why cant scientists stop telling us there is global warming when it isn't global warming at all?
The job of a scientist is not to proclaim what does or does not exist. A scientist collects justifiable facts and establish models to explain facts and form predictions. It is true that global temperatures have been falling for the last 12 years, but scientists don't say 'this disproves global warming' because it is not their job. Instead we are told by loud-mouth activists that this is just a blip (a 12 year blip out of the last 15) or that the climate is cooling but will soon warn up very sharply because it's cooling now. And of course some scientists ignore this information and carry on about it anyway. I suppose they've crossed from the 'scientist' side to the 'loud-mouth activists'.Very few scientists or climate experts are spouting anything that resembles a statement of certainty on this issue. That is left to political experts, environmental groups and extremists on either side. There is proof the planet has warmed 11 degrees over the past 6000 years. Most of that warming before man has burned any fuel. 0.2 to 0.5 degrees is all we have noticed since 1850 and almost all of that before WW2. Science and climate experts do not ignore the possibility, but only state the facts above. To make silly conclusions either way is left to those that do not bother with scientific principles. There is no certainty either way and no true science body claims there is.
What do scientists disagree about global warming?
The fact is that no scientist claims the planet has not warmed. It has by well over 10 degrees C in the past 10,000 years. What some science experts claim is that man is causing this issue by the burning of fossil fuels.Until 1996, almost no scientist even claimed this. What was claimed, in the beginning, is that man may be a contributor to global warming. The reason for this was the fact that man started recording temperatures globally around 1850.Two things were occurring at the same moment in this time period. Technology was really starting to move forward. The Steam engine came out and man started using fossil fuels. This was also the lowest temp period of what is called the mini ice age. Thus temps started to rise again.The result of these two things occurring at the same time meant we had two events whose data correlated. As technology moved forward so did the rise in temps. Over this time period we did see a rise in temp of about 0.66 degrees.Two occurring at the same time does not honestly or logically mean they are connected though. (It also does not mean to say they are NOT connected). At this same time their was a correlated decrease in the number pirate ships. This does not imply a relationship their either (although it could). A decrease in pirates does not mean an increase in temps. They corresponded, but were not related. We needed to determine f temp was related to human use of fossil fuel. Further study was needed.This created an industry known as the green movement. There are now hundreds of scientists that rely on this movement for their funding. Results now correlate to the side of the argument that provides the most funding. The conclusion of this argument does mean a serious loss of income to many science agencies like the GISS and the IPCC.The facts do not support man being a sole or major cause of warming. Almost no scientist claims this. What many do claim is that man could be a contributor. We know that almost all of the current warming trend occurred prior to man burning his first chuck of coal. (11 degrees total warming in past 10,000 years and 0.66 warming since 1850).Interesting little tidbit: Most of our 0.66 degrees of warming that we have seen since man did start using fossil fuels occurred prior to World War 2. The planet then spent a few decades cooling down during a period of high fuel use (1960's and 70's). So much so that the science experts believed that man was causing serious cooling of the planet. Since then 0.2 degrees of this warming has occurred over the 1938 level, despite a sharp spike in fossil fuel use.We also know that 1998 was the record warmest year and the IPCC claims we will see less warming for awhile. The term is now called climate change to allow for further funding despite the fact we do not see any warming trends globally. This allows for us to debate localized trends and ignore data that proves the world has cycles.What specific issues?Some science groups claim a decrease in rain, others claim an increaseSome say water Rise of 30 feet, others 12 inches (over 150 years)The bottom line is that no matter what changes you will see on the planet, some group will claim it to be caused by global warming.A:Two thousand five hundred (2500) scientists from the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) believe: The global average surface temperature has risen 0.6 ± 0.2 °C since the late 19th century, and 0.17 °C per decade in the last 30 years."Most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities", particularly from the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane.If the greenhouse gas emissions continue then the global warming will also continue. Temperatures may increase by 1.4 °C to 5.8 °C between 1990 and 2100. As well as temperature increase there will be increases in some types of extreme weather and a projected sea level rise of 9 cm to 88 cm, excluding "uncertainty relating to ice dynamical changes in the West Antarctic ice sheet". The impacts of global warming will be significantly negative.There are some scientists who disagree:Thirty thousand scientists believe global warming is not happening.Twenty scientists think the IPPC's projections above may be inaccurate and are sueing them.Twenty four scientists think the cause of global warming is unknown.Thousands more of scientists believe that global warming will cause no harm to the planet.See the list (and add to it) at the Wikipedia link below._______________________________________________________________There are a total of roughly 3500 individuals that worked with the IPCC report on climate change. 53 of these people were science experts, not 2500. Over 20 of these experts have sued the IPCC for changing the context of their statement and drawing invalid conclusions.The IPCC has missed virtually every projection they have ever made AND the modeling programs they use have been unable to repeat current events from past climates. There are over 100 "black box" mods needed to make the modeling systems they have used work. With enough false variables any modeling system will give you whatever you desire. Elephants can fly with enough false information provided to your program.Just to show you how massively non science based the politics of this issue has become. We even have Physicists resigning from the " American Physical Society " because the science does not support the idea of man induced global warming yet the debate has been settled according to politicians. (attached link)
What is the inconvenient truth about the global warming?
The reality of global warming is an inconvenient truth for vested interests and those who would rather we ignore it. It is also inconvenient because it will not just go away if we do nothing.
What are three sentences for the word ignore?
I chose not to ignore your question but to answer it.I asked my dad for some money but he chose to ignore me.If I ignore the problem it might go away.
Why do so many people want to ignore the other side of the global warming argument?
People ignore the other side (the one they disagree with) because they disagree with it. People stick to what they believe. They look at the facts and they decide what they want to believe.
Making a scientific method about preventing global warming?
sorry, that was my evil twin. soo.....yes, i dont think there can be a method to prevent global warming. im sorry.you could make one?!! like .....build a global cooling machiene? nah im just messing. but, its ok. we will all live a happy life and then die and ignore the warmings. understand? ok!!!!!!!
What percentage of Democrats are into global warming?
The concept of Global Warming being real or not is hardly a party issue. The concept has moved away from the science and moved into a very political arena. Both sides take a similar view on Global Warming. They ignore the science and claim that the debate is over. It almost seems like the Democrat party's stand on global warming is that global warming is caused by Republicans. If you want it colder vote for Democrats. If you want it warmer vote for Republicans. This, of course, is not their official position.
Were the speakers arguments effective?
Effective arguments are those that are done calmly and rationally. If someone yells or tries to force opinions, then others are likely to ignore them.
Why did Al Gore entitle his movie An Inconvenient Truth?
Al Gore felt that the reality of global warming is an inconvenient truth for vested interests and those who would rather we ignore it. It is also inconvenient because it will not just go away if we do nothing.
What are Arguments against intelligent design behind evolution?
Every argument against evolution falls into several categories. 1.) It could disprove something if it were true, but that something would not be evolution. 2.) There are no arguments for Intelligent design, all they have are arguments against evolution (and sometime plate tectonics, cosmology, mathematics's, or oceanography). 3.) Every single argument made against evolution or any other natural science in defence of intelligent design (also known as creationism as determined by a conservative Christian judge) has been used as an argument against intelligent design and backing up the science that the creationists are trying to ignore. Summary: Take any creationist claim, summarize it, and take the reverse of that and you get the scientific arguments against intelligent design and for evolution.
How can global warming kill people?
Realistically, global warming is a needed event. Without this warming we would be dead. The concept of man contributing is different. The warming we have seen of of over 0.2 degrees since 1934 has been blamed on man by many political groups that ignore the fact the planet has been warming for 10,000 years.0.2 degrees of warming is not going to kill people. There is no evidence of an increase in storms. Polar bears are not dieing because of the weather and much of the horror stories you hear about the issue are pretty much that, stories.A:It is difficult to attribute specific deaths to global warming. As glaciers vanish, it seems likely deaths will result from the loss of rivers that serve as drinking water. Global warming will cause (and may already have caused) intensified storm activity, but it is beyond our capability to attribute any specific storm to global warming. Sea level rise is a serious concern, but it will likely take decades for ocean levels rising as a result of ocean warming to affect more than small, low-lying mid-ocean islands. Droughts and heatwaves are difficult to specifically attribute to global warming, but will intensify in some areas and those can lead to deaths.
Is global survey freebies real?
No, it's not. It's a scam, ignore it.
Should Australia care for other countries with rising sea levels?
Australia may have no choice. The wealthy countries that have contributed to global warming and rising sea levels can hardly ignore the plight of those people who then lose their homes on low-lying islands.
What possible outcome of plastic pollution ten years from now?
Ten years from now, if we ignore the problem of plastic pollution, the world can be so hot because of global warming. The plastics can contribute to global warming by burning the plastics. It is said that every kilogram of plastic when burnt creates six kilograms of carbon dioxide. Another possible outcome is the massive flooding because the plastics are clogging the waterways because of the irresponsible doings of the people. =))) -JasC
