Interesting question! As far as I can discover, the answer isn't obvious at all. Let me explain: Interviews and intelligence of terrorist organizations ranging from the IRA to Al-quaida, Baader-Meinhoff, and others show some remarkable, unexpected similarities. They typically do not have a cohesive, well-understood political doctrine or goal. And even when there is a political manifesto of sorts in place, the actions of the group typically don't facilitate this: * They're own people often don't know or understand their own manifesto. * They rarely conduct dialogues with the regime they're trying to modify, so the means of compromise or even capitualtion is closed off. * They frequently attack other organizations that share their goals. * They often do not effectively claim credit for actions, thus making said action a completely moot point * They often change doctrine and direction with no particular or apparent reason. * When their demands are met, for whatever reason, this does not cause the group to stand down. This applies equally to so-called religious terrorists; they quite often don't understand the religion their group esposes, nor do they seem to want to learn. An example:(see link) A number of the 9/11 Al Quaida group first intended to fight in Chechnya. When they couldn't get the paperwork together to enter Chechnya, they decided to attack America instead. There was no discernable direction in a political or religious sense at all. So what is it then? Actually, most terrorist groups of the late 20th and early 21st centuries seem to follow very closely the dynamic we observe in modern day street gangs. That is to say, an amazingly strong need or desire for community and culture. Here are some examples: * Frequently, families will all join the same group, even if that group doesn't match that family's focus or interest. The same applies to village members and friends. * These families (for lack of a better word) will frequently change groups, sometimes to terrorist organizations with a sharply divergent manifesto. * They use symbology akin to gang sign. * Status is critically important within the group. A lot of this is true of the Crips, Bloods and Latin Kings, where solidarity of family, group, and neighborhood is a far more prevalent motivator than political or theological doctrine. Ref: Max Abrams, predoctoral fellow at Stanford University's Center for International Security and Cooperation, and Bruce Schneier of Counterpane Systems. See also "Seven Habits of Highly Ineffective Terrorists", Crypto-Grams, Schneier
The two functional groups that react to form nylon are an amine group (-NH2) and a carboxylic acid group (-COOH). These groups undergo a condensation reaction to form an amide bond, resulting in the polymer known as nylon.
No, the elements in all groups do not ionise. Some of the elements share electrons to form compounds.
Phylogenetic classification groups animals based on their evolutionary relationships and shared ancestry. It organizes species into groups called clades, which include an ancestor and all its descendants. This form of classification aims to reflect the evolutionary history of organisms.
an ecosystem
No. Terrorist attacks are man-made disasters, deliberately caused by humans.
There were no terrorist groups in World War I.
There is no terrorist group with its base of operations in Israel, but numerous Palestinian terrorist groups aim their violence towards Israel and intend to kill Israelis. The last Zionist Terrorist Group was the Irgun, which was disbanded in 1949.
The Pakistan government is involved in funding the terrorist groups, but its not a terrorist country itself!
no
palestinian territories are occupied by israel.
The Taliban
the terrorist groups......................
Issue-oriented groups
True
Prevention of terrorist attack Prevention of terrorist attack
There are a number of left-wing terrorist organizations, such as FARC in Colombia, the Japanese Red Army, Shining Path, and Eco-Terrorist Groups.
There isn't exactly ONE specific place where terrorist groups come from. But most people will lean towards thinking that its in Middle East where most groups like these are established-but that's what the media and news portray and show us.