Because they are so far away.
It is closer to us than the other stars so we get a much, much larger fraction of its light compared to other stars. The other stars are so far away that even stars that are much brighter than our sun can only transmit such a small fraction of their light that the tiny fraction we get is consequently much less than the larger fraction of our somewhat dimmer sun.
It is closer to us than the other stars so we get a much, much larger fraction of its light compared to other stars. The other stars are so far away that even stars that are much brighter than our sun can only transmit such a small fraction of their light that the tiny fraction we get is consequently much less than the larger fraction of our somewhat dimmer sun.
No. Asteroids are tiny compared to stars.
Because they are so far away, they seem tiny, because of perspective.
They don't specifically orbit the black hole. Stars orbit the Milky Way because in general, they are attracted to the other masses in the Milky Way. The supermassive black hole is only a tiny fraction of the total mass of the Milky Way. Well, you might say that they move around the black hole, but that's only because it happens to be there. Without they black hole, they would move around the center of the Milky Way anyway.
There are other channels you get. The tiny stars on the radio represent the other channels. You got those tiny stars when you got the Exp card.
It is closer to us than the other stars so we get a much, much larger fraction of its light compared to other stars. The other stars are so far away that even stars that are much brighter than our sun can only transmit such a small fraction of their light that the tiny fraction we get is consequently much less than the larger fraction of our somewhat dimmer sun.
It is closer to us than the other stars so we get a much, much larger fraction of its light compared to other stars. The other stars are so far away that even stars that are much brighter than our sun can only transmit such a small fraction of their light that the tiny fraction we get is consequently much less than the larger fraction of our somewhat dimmer sun.
It is closer to us than the other stars so we get a much, much larger fraction of its light compared to other stars. The other stars are so far away that even stars that are much brighter than our sun can only transmit such a small fraction of their light that the tiny fraction we get is consequently much less than the larger fraction of our somewhat dimmer sun.
A:No. Stars are just like our sun, but so enormously distant that they seem like a tiny speck of light. Angels are concepts in some religions, but if they exist they are certainly not stars.
The sun appears bigger and brighter than other stars because it is much closer to Earth compared to the distant stars. Stars are actually suns, but they look tiny and faint because of their immense distance from us.
No. Asteroids are tiny compared to stars.
Unfortuately a trip to Mars is only a very tiny distance compared to the distances of stars, so you would definitely see the same constellations as you see here.
Stars appear tiny to us because they are incredibly far away in the vast expanse of space. Despite their immense size and brightness, the distances between stars and us are so vast that they appear as mere points of light in the sky.
it only takes a tiny, tiny, little amount that you cant see or smell, but other animals can.
I cannot understand your question. But, the stars are billions and billions of miles away from us, except the Sun, of course. Scientists called astronomers DO name and number the stars. There is only time enough to number a tiny portion of all the stars. Just in our Milky Way galaxy there are billions of stars. Think about the fact that there are billions of other galaxies in the universe.
Shooting stars are not stars at all. They are tiny bits of debris, usually rock or dust. They completely burn up in our atmosphere (most of them) and so when you see one 'vanish', it is, in fact, gone.