Krakatoa, located in Indonesia, is not a good place to live primarily due to its history of catastrophic volcanic eruptions, the most famous being in 1883, which caused widespread destruction and loss of life. The region remains seismically active, posing ongoing risks of eruptions and tsunamis. Additionally, the lack of infrastructure and harsh environmental conditions make it challenging for sustainable living. Overall, the geological hazards and potential for natural disasters significantly deter permanent habitation.
Krakatoa is in the Indian sea
There is currently no evidence to suggest that Krakatoa is reforming. The volcanic island last erupted in 1883, causing one of the most powerful eruptions in recorded history. While volcanic activity can never be entirely ruled out, there is no indication at present that Krakatoa is undergoing any significant reformation.
Krakatoa and Anak Krakatoa are not the same volcano. Krakatoa refers to the volcanic island that existed before its massive eruption in 1883, leading to the collapse of the island. Anak Krakatoa, meaning "Child of Krakatoa," is a new volcanic island that has emerged from the sea in the same location and is actively growing as a result of volcanic activity.
No. The volcano is intermittently active, making it too dangerous and unstable for anyone to live there.
, The population of Krakatoa, Indonesia. Did not no the Volcano would erupt. however it was the second most devastating volcano in history. One of the most powerful volcanic explosions in the history of the world occured at Krakatoa in the last century. Krakatoa was formerly a volcanic island located between Java and Sumatra. It was located near a region where the Indo-Australian plate subducts under the Eurasian plate. In May, 1883, a series of eruptions commenced which continued until August 27, 1883, when a cataclismic explosion blew the island apart. The large explosion was due to super-hot steam, created when the walls of the volcano ruptered and let ocean water into the magma chamber. The island exploded with the force of 100 megatons (the Hiroshima bomb was about 20 kilotons). The explosion was heard as far away as Madagascar (2,200 miles). Tsunamis from the explosion were raised to 131 ft, and destroyed 163 villages along the coast of Java and Sumatra. Ash from the explosion rose 50 miles in altitude (higher than altitudes where airplanes fly), and it affected the weather for the next year. Ash can have a cooling effect on weather because it remains in the sky and reduces the amount of sunlight reaching the surface.
A good place to start would be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krakatoa
Yes, the noun 'Krakatoa' is a proper noun, the name of a specific place.
is the world a good place to live or is it a bad place to live
A good place to live is a relative question. Medford, Oregon may be a good place to live for some people, but not others.
You can get close to it, but there is no place on Krakatoa, now called Anak Krakatau to land one. The island is accessible by boat and perhaps by helicopter.
Yes, Portugal is known as a very good place to live.
It's not a good place for them to live. That's why they don't live there.
on the opposite side of the world
A good place to live is near Arkansas not that bad on Cost. Not much of taxes. ;-)
I think it is a good place to live in because I was born in Iowa, and it has lots of nice people that live there
The Krakatoa volcano eruption that occurred in 1883 in Sumatra, Indonesia. It was so powerful that it even destroyed the volcano. Today, Krakatoa's son, "Anak Krakatau" that was made of Krakatoa's eruption stands on the remains of the 1883 Krakatoa eruption.
it is a good place to live because you may find ancient artifacts