An atomic bomb releases more energy than a conventional chemical bomb because the atomic bomb releases binding, or Nuclear Strong Force, energy while the conventional bomb releases chemical energy, and there is far more binding energy (hundreds and thousands of times) than there is chemical energy from the same mass of material.
The amount of energy released from a fission reaction is much greater than that from a chemical reaction because fission involves the splitting of atomic nuclei, leading to a significant release of nuclear binding energy. This energy release is millions of times greater than the energy released in chemical reactions, which involve breaking and forming chemical bonds.
Chemical energy can be converted into nuclear energy through nuclear reactions. In nuclear reactions, the particles within an atom's nucleus, such as protons and neutrons, are rearranged, resulting in the release of vast amounts of energy. This transformation requires processes like nuclear fission (splitting of atomic nuclei) or fusion (combining of atomic nuclei).
Atomic bombs use nuclear fission or fusion to release a massive amount of energy. In nuclear fission, atoms are split to release energy, whereas in fusion, atoms are combined to release energy. This energy release creates a powerful explosion.
Chemical processes store and release energy in the form of chemical bonds. This energy is either absorbed when bonds are formed or released when bonds are broken, resulting in various chemical reactions taking place.
they must release chemical energy
No, an atomic bomb is a form of nuclear energy, not chemical energy. Atomic bombs release energy through a process called nuclear fission, where the nucleus of an atom is split, producing a massive amount of energy. Chemical energy, on the other hand, is related to the interaction of atoms through chemical bonds.
Yes, atomic energy is considered a non-conventional source of energy. It is derived from nuclear reactions, specifically fission or fusion processes, and is different from conventional sources like fossil fuels or renewable energy sources.
No chemical energy is the energy of changing
That is called chemical energy - assuming conventional fuel. Nuclear fuel has nuclear energy.
The kind of energy associated with atomic bonds is chemical energy. This energy is released or absorbed when atoms form or break bonds with each other during chemical reactions.
The amount of energy released from a fission reaction is much greater than that from a chemical reaction because fission involves the splitting of atomic nuclei, leading to a significant release of nuclear binding energy. This energy release is millions of times greater than the energy released in chemical reactions, which involve breaking and forming chemical bonds.
Nuclear energy releases more energy than chemical energy. Nuclear reactions involve the splitting (fission) or merging (fusion) of atomic nuclei, which release a large amount of energy compared to chemical reactions that involve the breaking and forming of chemical bonds.
Nuclear energy vastly overshadows the energy from chemical and mechanical energy, because nuclear energy is based on the release of binding energy, which lies at the core of everything. It is the Strong Atomic Force.
Fusion and fission are both nuclear processes that release large amounts of energy by breaking or combining atomic nuclei, while chemical energy involves the breaking or forming of chemical bonds to release energy. All three processes involve converting mass into energy through different mechanisms.
Chemical energy can be converted into nuclear energy through nuclear reactions. In nuclear reactions, the particles within an atom's nucleus, such as protons and neutrons, are rearranged, resulting in the release of vast amounts of energy. This transformation requires processes like nuclear fission (splitting of atomic nuclei) or fusion (combining of atomic nuclei).
That is called chemical energy - assuming conventional fuel. Nuclear fuel has nuclear energy.
The conventional bombs are the non-nuclear ones. They use a exotermic chemical reaction to obtain a sudden release of great amount of energy. In such weapons, nuclear fission and fussion are not significant source of energy, and radiocativity is not used as part of its offensive power. Regards, Mario/Brazil