No chemical energy is the energy of changing
No, an atomic bomb is a form of nuclear energy, not chemical energy. Atomic bombs release energy through a process called nuclear fission, where the nucleus of an atom is split, producing a massive amount of energy. Chemical energy, on the other hand, is related to the interaction of atoms through chemical bonds.
An atomic bomb releases more energy than a conventional chemical bomb because the atomic bomb releases binding, or Nuclear Strong Force, energy while the conventional bomb releases chemical energy, and there is far more binding energy (hundreds and thousands of times) than there is chemical energy from the same mass of material.
The kind of energy associated with atomic bonds is chemical energy. This energy is released or absorbed when atoms form or break bonds with each other during chemical reactions.
The atomic number is the same for the isotopes of a chemical element.
Nuclear and atomic energy are terms that are often used interchangeably to refer to the same type of energy generated by splitting atoms in a process called nuclear fission. Both terms are typically used to describe the same type of energy generation.
The atomic number is identical for all the isotopes of the same chemical element.
an isotope
Electron. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The electron itself does not store energy. It is the position of the electron in relation to atomic nuclei that contains the chemical bond energy.
Atomic energy is really a misnomer for nuclear energy. It is the fissioning of the nucleus which causes energy to be released. At the atomic level we are dealing with chemical reactions, but in the early days people did talk of atomic power and atomic bombs.
Elements in the same group on the periodic table have similar chemical properties because they have the same number of valence electrons. This leads to similarities in reactivity, bonding behavior, and chemical reactions among elements in the same group. Additionally, elements in the same group tend to show patterns in atomic size, ionization energy, and electronegativity due to the arrangement of electrons in their outer energy levels.
Yes, atomic energy was the term used up to the 50's, then nuclear energy became the normal term, it is more correct.
Nope, their chemical make up changes, changing the total atomic mass.