An atomic bomb releases more energy than a conventional chemical bomb because the atomic bomb releases binding, or Nuclear Strong Force, energy while the conventional bomb releases chemical energy, and there is far more binding energy (hundreds and thousands of times) than there is chemical energy from the same mass of material.
fat
they must release chemical energy
Thebond energy in an atomic nucleus are greater than the energy of chemical bonds.The binding enegy of a nucleon is 7,6 MeV.
What you stated is true for an OBJECT. The energy contained in the 'Substance' that the Object is made of includes its "Atomic Energy", and its Chemical Energy.
An exothermic reaction.
yes
No chemical energy is the energy of changing
That is called chemical energy - assuming conventional fuel. Nuclear fuel has nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy
Nuclear energy vastly overshadows the energy from chemical and mechanical energy, because nuclear energy is based on the release of binding energy, which lies at the core of everything. It is the Strong Atomic Force.
A pencil would contain kinetic energy while it is moving, potential energy because it could be dropped and release energy that way, chemical energy because the chemical and atomic bonds in it could break and release energy, and slight heat energy because the friction of the graphite on the paper would cause frictional heating.
That is called chemical energy - assuming conventional fuel. Nuclear fuel has nuclear energy.
The conventional bombs are the non-nuclear ones. They use a exotermic chemical reaction to obtain a sudden release of great amount of energy. In such weapons, nuclear fission and fussion are not significant source of energy, and radiocativity is not used as part of its offensive power. Regards, Mario/Brazil
chemical
Mitochondria do not make chemical energy, the release it.
They release some of the energy bound in atomic nuclei.
Definition of conventional and non conventional energy