Unlike religion, science need objective and strong evidence before giving credit to a theory as explanation of something. And anything that has been proven "true" can always be proven wrong by any other new theory which fits better or simoly be proven wrong.
True. In an experiment, a scientist formulates a hypothesis, designs the experiment, collects data, and then analyzes the results to draw conclusions. The outcome of the experiment is not known beforehand, and it is the results of the experiment that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
If a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis, it means that the evidence gathered from their experiments or observations was not strong enough to disprove the hypothesis. This does not confirm the hypothesis as true; instead, it suggests that there is insufficient evidence to support an alternative explanation. It is important to note that failing to reject a hypothesis does not provide proof of its validity, and further research may be needed to draw more definitive conclusions.
If a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis, it means that the data collected from experiments or observations did not provide sufficient evidence to disprove that hypothesis. This does not necessarily prove the hypothesis to be true; rather, it indicates that there is not enough support to conclude it is false. The results may suggest that further research is needed to explore the hypothesis more thoroughly. Ultimately, the failure to reject a hypothesis is a part of the scientific process and contributes to the ongoing evaluation of scientific theories.
Hypotheses can never be totally proven because only portions of populations are used to test them. There are many variables making it likely that results will not always be the same. However, tests with positive outcomes can strongly infer the likelihood that their hypotheses are correct.
That he either found it to be incorrect or heard from a majority of other scientists working in the same field of study that the hypothesis isn't true. Though it's almost always the first one I said.
No, a "hypothesis" is a geuss. In an expirement, a scientist will come up with a hypothesis, and then see if it is true. Therefore, a hypothesis is NOT set in stone until proven.
No. A hypothesis is an educated guess, based on observation. Usually, a hypothesis can be supported or refuted through experimentation or more observation. A hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true.
Hypothesis are theories which are yet to be proven. They are proven when they are proved to be true as in experiments.
This statement is correct because a hypothesis is a proposed explanation that has not been validated through experimentation and evidence. Scientific inquiry aims to test and gather evidence to support or reject a hypothesis, rather than proving it true. It is always possible for new evidence or data to emerge that could challenge or refine a hypothesis.
Scientist consider hypothesis to be an educated guess on what they are studying. If that scientist researches and experiments more, he will see if his hypothesis is true or false.
false
well it all depends on what your hypotthesis is but some can be proven true ,or some can be proven false. But it all depends on what you are doing
Only some hypothesizes have been proven not to be true. The reason that is that a hypothesis is the same thing as a prediction. Just as you could predict that, for example, the weather was going to be cloudy today, but it turned out sunny, a scientist could predict, or hypothesize, that in a certain experiment, for example, there would be a chemical reaction, but there wasn't.
a educated guess about a ubject that is proven true
a educated guess about a ubject that is proven true
A hypothesis is what someone suggests could be true, and then tests it to see whether or not it is true. A law is what has been proven to be true.
Yes, a falsifiable hypothesis can be tested because it can be proven true or false through experimentation or observation. If evidence is found that contradicts the hypothesis, then it can be disproven. This process is essential in the scientific method to advance knowledge and understanding.