No new coal deposits are currently under formation. One possible explanation for this is the evolution of a fungus responsible for digesting cellulose. Another is that coal formation is an extremely slow and gradual process, occurring over hundreds of thousands of years.
The rate at which we are burning coal vastly exceeds the rate at which any new deposits could possibly form. Therefore the activity is not sustainable. However, we do have sufficient coal deposits to continue burning this resource at present rates of consumption for centuries to come. The wisdom of doing this, however, in light of the increasing abundance of resultant heat trapping carbon dioxide, remains highly questionable.
No. But burning coal will likely produce carbon monoxide.
Burning coal is a chemical process in which coal reacts with oxygen and forming carbon doxide and or monoxide.
The alternatives to burning coal for electricity generation are:Water (hydro power) if availablenuclear energybiomass and geothermal energyrenewable energy sources as solar and wind energy.
Yes, a law should be in place to prevent households from burning coal due to its harmful effects on the environment, including contributing to air pollution and the destruction of the ozone layer. Implementing alternative and cleaner energy sources would help mitigate these negative impacts and promote a more sustainable future for the planet.
Coal is a fossil fuel that produces harmful emissions when burned, leading to air and water pollution. The mining and transportation of coal can also have negative impacts on the environment, such as habitat destruction and water contamination. Therefore, transitioning to renewables and cleaner energy sources would be more sustainable solutions to the oil problem.
Burning oil produces fewer emissions and pollutants compared to coal, making it slightly better for the environment in terms of air quality. However, both oil and coal are fossil fuels that contribute to climate change, so transitioning to renewable energy sources is the most sustainable option.
where at Amidon can you see burning coal beds
Coal is obviously not renewable, as it took millions of years to form, but there is still plenty of coal in many countries, so it will no doubt go on being used, mainly to produce electricity, also iron in blast furnaces.
Burning wood is generally considered more environmentally friendly than burning coal because wood is a renewable resource and releases fewer harmful emissions when burned. However, both coal and wood burning can contribute to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, so it's best to minimize the use of either and explore more sustainable alternatives for heating and energy production.
The word equation for burning coal is: coal + oxygen -> carbon dioxide + heat
NO
82% comes from coal burning. Hope that helps!
The fiber that is a byproduct of burning coal is called coal ash. Coal ash is a fine powder consisting of mineral particles that are produced when coal is burned at power plants.
The word equation for burning coal is: Coal + Oxygen -> Carbon Dioxide + Water + Heat
Oil
Yes, this is done in all coal burning power plants
The burning point of coal depends on the type of coal, but it generally ranges from 700°C to 1300°C. At these temperatures, coal combusts and releases heat energy.