It's misleading to discuss those ideas because there are
no such things as absolute motion or rest.
No, they can't. But they are in Isaac Newton's classic theory of motion.
motion : when a body is moving or changing its position with respect to its surroundings is called motion. rest: when a body is not moving or fixed at a place with respect to its surroundings is called rest.
The earth rotates and also undergoes revolution and is therefore classified as a moving object.so the plants and building on earth cannot be at rest and must also be state in motion, with respect to the sun and heavenly bodies, then it is called absolute rest.
Newton's first law of motion was the law of inertia. When an object is in motion, it stays in motion. When an object is in rest, it stays in rest.
No, kinematics specifically refers to the study of motion. If an object is at rest, there is no motion occurring, and therefore no kinematics.
This cannot be answered. This does not make any sense.
Motion and rest are relative concepts, as they depend on the frame of reference from which they are observed. An object in motion appears differently depending on the frame of reference from which it is observed, so motion and rest are not absolute but rather determined by the observer's perspective.
No, they can't. But they are in Isaac Newton's classic theory of motion.
Absolute rest is commonly called absolute zero. To cool something by extracting energy it must be placed in an environment with less average energy than it contains; this requires the environment to be already at or below absolute zero, which requires something to make it that temperature. This thing must be at or below absolute zero as well... and we enter a causality loop where being able to do one thing requires it to have been done. Thus it is impossible.
No, according to the principle of relativity in physics, there is no frame of reference that is considered to be in absolute rest. All motion is relative, meaning that an object's state of rest or motion can only be described in relation to another object or a particular frame of reference.
motion : when a body is moving or changing its position with respect to its surroundings is called motion. rest: when a body is not moving or fixed at a place with respect to its surroundings is called rest.
Motion is a fundamental property of the universe, nothing is at absolute rest.
He is in motion relative to me, and he is at rest relative to his friends. There is no 'real' rest or 'real' motion. It's always measured relative to something else.
The earth rotates and also undergoes revolution and is therefore classified as a moving object.so the plants and building on earth cannot be at rest and must also be state in motion, with respect to the sun and heavenly bodies, then it is called absolute rest.
Rest and motion are relative terms, meaning they are defined in relation to a particular frame of reference. An object at rest in one frame of reference may be in motion in another frame. This concept is a key aspect of Einstein's theory of relativity.
No, an inertial reference frame is not an absolute reference frame. It is a frame of reference in which an object either remains at rest or moves with constant velocity in a straight line, but it is not considered absolute as its motion can be affected by external forces.
In theory, yes, but how you would define, leave alone measure or prove it, I struggle to imagine.