0
Having evidence to support a statement is important because it adds credibility and strengthens the argument being made. Evidence helps to validate the claim and gives others a reason to believe or trust in the information being provided. Without evidence, statements can be seen as purely opinion-based and lacking in credibility.
What else can I help you with?
What is a true statement about scientific evidence?
A true statement about scientific evidence is that it is based on empirical observations and rigorous experimentation. Scientific evidence must be reproducible and verifiable, meaning that other researchers should be able to replicate the findings under the same conditions. Additionally, it is subject to peer review and must be critically evaluated to ensure its validity and reliability. Ultimately, scientific evidence helps build and refine theories about natural phenomena.
What is a example for contadiction?
An example of a contradiction is the statement, "I always lie." If the statement is true, then the speaker is lying, which means the statement must be false. Conversely, if the statement is false, then the speaker does not always lie, making the original claim contradictory. This creates a paradox where the truth of the statement cannot be consistently determined.
What is claim in scientific method?
A claim in the scientific method refers to a statement asserting a relationship between two or more variables. This statement is based on evidence and analysis of data collected through experimentation or observation. Claims must be supported by evidence and subject to rigorous testing to determine their validity.
What is statement of nature that seems to be true is s scientific?
A statement of nature that seems to be true is considered scientific if it can be tested, observed, and potentially falsified through experimentation or observation. For a statement to be scientifically valid, it must also be consistent with established knowledge and able to generate predictions that can be verified. This process allows for continuous refinement and improvement of scientific understanding based on new evidence.
What variable must controlled to provide evidence to support the law of conservation of mass when alka-seltzer and water are mixed?
When Alka-Seltzer and water come into contact it creates a reaction that produces gas. This is evident by the fizzing bubbles. In order to support the law of conservation of mass you would need to capture and measure the gas.
Is evidence only necessary when you write research papers?
This statement is incorrect. You must have evidence to support any opinion you give - whether it is a paper, a speech, a conversation, or just a paragraph! The way that you prove what you are saying is by giving evidence to support it.
Why is a hypothesis important even if the evidence fails to support it?
When working through an idea using the rules of the scientific method, you first must start out with a statement of what you hope to find or prove. It's the "What I want to find" to the Method & Methodologies' "How I am going to find it." Even if the data or evidence fail(s) to support it, you still need the statement of purpose. If the statement and results are not a good fit, then the statement (hypothesis) can be revised or thrown out.
Why is a hypothesis important even if evidence fails to support it?
When working through an idea using the rules of the scientific method, you first must start out with a statement of what you hope to find or prove. It's the "What I want to find" to the Method & Methodologies' "How I am going to find it." Even if the data or evidence fail(s) to support it, you still need the statement of purpose. If the statement and results are not a good fit, then the statement (hypothesis) can be revised or thrown out.
Should we reject the validity of anbureys statement?
To assess the validity of Anburey's statement, one must consider the context, evidence, and the reliability of the sources involved. If the statement lacks credible support or contradicts established facts, it may warrant rejection. However, if corroborated by reliable evidence, it should be considered valid. Ultimately, a careful evaluation of the statement's context and supporting information is essential.
What do historians do to support thesis statements?
The best way to support or refute a thesis statement is with factual evidence. You can bring in outside sources that either prove or oppose the thesis statement. You should be able to provide a variety of sources so that you can examine the thesis statement from multiple angles.
If the statement if I am hungry then I am not hungry is assumed to be true is its inverse if I am not hungry then I must be happy also always true?
No
A thesis statement must do what?
require support
When the author makes a he or she is stating something which might or might not be true. It must be argued?
When an author makes a statement, they are expressing a claim or belief that can be persuasive or informative. The statement may be based on evidence, reasoning, or personal opinion, and it leaves room for debate or disagreement. It is up to the author to effectively argue their point and provide support for their statement to convince the audience of its validity.
What is a true statement about scientific evidence?
A true statement about scientific evidence is that it is based on empirical observations and rigorous experimentation. Scientific evidence must be reproducible and verifiable, meaning that other researchers should be able to replicate the findings under the same conditions. Additionally, it is subject to peer review and must be critically evaluated to ensure its validity and reliability. Ultimately, scientific evidence helps build and refine theories about natural phenomena.
What is a example for contadiction?
An example of a contradiction is the statement, "I always lie." If the statement is true, then the speaker is lying, which means the statement must be false. Conversely, if the statement is false, then the speaker does not always lie, making the original claim contradictory. This creates a paradox where the truth of the statement cannot be consistently determined.
Who does the burden of proof fall on in a libel case?
In a libel case, the burden of proof typically falls on the plaintiff, who must demonstrate that the defamatory statement was made, that it is false, and that it caused harm to their reputation. Additionally, if the plaintiff is a public figure, they must also prove that the statement was made with actual malice, meaning the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. The defendant may then provide evidence to support defenses like truth or opinion.
Is a signed statement evidence of guilt?
A signed statement can be considered evidence, but it is not definitive proof of guilt. Its weight as evidence depends on various factors, including the circumstances under which it was obtained, the clarity of the confession, and whether the individual was fully aware of their rights. Additionally, a signed statement may be subject to challenges regarding coercion, voluntariness, or the individual's mental state at the time of signing. Ultimately, it must be evaluated in the context of all available evidence.
