That's the thing he isn't wrong. Continental drift is totally right. How else would Africa & South Africa be able to fit together like a jigsaw?
The fossil that was found on different continents and used to support the theory of continental drift is the Mesosaurus. This extinct freshwater reptile had limited swimming abilities, making it unlikely that it could have crossed vast oceans. Its distribution on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean provided evidence of land connections that later formed the basis for the theory of continental drift.
In 1915 the first edition of The Origin of Continents and Oceans, a book outlining the Continental Drift theory of Alfred Lothar Wegener, a German meterologist, was published; expanded editions were published in 1920, 1922, and 1929. About 300 million years ago, claimed Wegener, the continents had formed a single mass, called Pangaea (from the Greek for "all the Earth"). Pangaea had split, and its pieces had been moving away from each other ever since. Wegener was not the first to suggest that the continents had once been connected, but he was the first to present extensive evidence from several fields. He was subsequently proved right, although he was wrong in one respect; the continents don't drift on their own, they move as part of much larger "plates" of the Earth's surface, much of which is ocean floor.
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
If you ask me it's because they wer a bunch of arogant "scientists" who didn't have a clue what they were talking about and hated being wrong. Just like with Galileo. They could have been scarred to accept things like that. I don't believe in it though... :) De Nada
Alfred Wegener, a German meteorologist, proposed the theory of continental drift in the early 20th century. He suggested that the continents were once part of a single supercontinent called Pangaea that broke apart and drifted to their current positions. Although his ideas were initially met with skepticism, they formed the foundation for the modern theory of plate tectonics.
Because , firstly, he was an outsider. He had no proof. His theory that centrifugal force from Earth's rotation caused the drifting was proved to not have enough force to move continents, nor could he explain how continents moved through the sea floor. They had other theories about it (they were wrong of course) Seeing as it was 1916 and he was German they might not have trusted him (WW1) He had no backing. They thought you could not use geology to interpret the past.
Yes and no. His hypothesis about how the plates were moved eventually was proven wrong, although his hypothesis that the plates had shifted in position over time was proven. The physical evidence in support of continental drift (now referred to as the theory of plate tectonics) began to be considered overwhelming back in the 1960s, with the discovery of the mid-ocean ridges and the accompanying paleomagnetic striping along the sea floor which has recorded magnetic reversals in newly formed crustal rock. More recently, we have measured the rates of motion of each of the continental plates using GPS satellite technology. The fact the plates drift is now indisputable.
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
seafloor spreading is when molten material rises and cools down and makes new seafloor, continental drift is the theory that the continents were once together and the big land mass is called Pangea.this is fake story no one believe it i got wrong
there is never really a wrong hypothesis because its basically just a guess....
It is when you know that your hypothesis is wrong.
You can modify it(if u think it your hypothesis is wrong). However,a hypothesis is actually a guess of the result.Thus, it has no right or wrong in your hypothesis.
the Hypothesis would probably be also wrong but its okay because a hypothesis is a educated guess
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community.* Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
The fossil that was found on different continents and used to support the theory of continental drift is the Mesosaurus. This extinct freshwater reptile had limited swimming abilities, making it unlikely that it could have crossed vast oceans. Its distribution on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean provided evidence of land connections that later formed the basis for the theory of continental drift.
Her hypothesis was wrong, and the teacher marked her entire assignment wrong because of it.
that depends on exactly what the hypothesis is. You cannot determine if something is right or wrong by who made the hypothesis.