Pasteur's experiment demonstrating spontaneous generation was considered better because he designed a more controlled experiment with swan-necked flasks that allowed air in but prevented microbes from entering. This disproved the theory of spontaneous generation more conclusively than Spallanzani's experiment which critics argued could have been affected by lack of oxygen.
You can use any metal as a control, like steel. The experiment then becomes, "what metals conduct heat better than steel?"
How about a ton of drawings and illustrations? Use the link below and there will be more than you can do. By the way, the experiment is usually called the Geiger-Marsden Experiment as it was done by these two researchers. There is a link to the Wikipedia post on this experiment below as well.
Giving some to whatever you're trying to poison and seeing if it dies. It's more a biological experiment than a chemical one.
it has better wire than a rubber tube
A fair experiment is fair wheras an accurate experiment is more accurate. LOL Joke. The latter simply means the results are to a higher degree of.... accuracy e.g instead of to 5, the result could be 5.1235 However a fair experiment is a test carried out under fair conditions. If testing more than once during the experiment you have to be sure that things remain at the same level i.e. Temperatures Amounts of reactants Time must remain the same..
Pasteur's experiment refuted the theory of spontaneous generation by demonstrating that microorganisms in broth were killed by heat and could only enter through the air. Spallanzani's experiment involved boiling broth in sealed flasks to prevent microorganism entry, concluding that the lack of spontaneous generation was due to the lack of vital force rather than the absence of air.
A controlled experiment is better than a none controlled experiment because you can control one of them and the other you can't. Science is a really fun subject.
yes it will i did an experiment and sprite does corrode faster and better than coke.
Klutzy did perform her experiment to conclude that audio information is remembered slightly better than visual information. Showing that audio is a way to listen and take in information and visual is when you see and read something.
if you get addicted, it might lead to death. don't try to experiment them. you're better than that.
Visual information is slightly better than audio. It can print out a hard copy of the visual information but you cannot do that with the audio information.
It tells you how accurate your results are. If you do the experiment multiple times and get different results, then there is something wrong with the experiment or what you are measuring. Its just like a survey, the more people you ask, the closer to the actual population opinion you get.
Some people think that seeds are more "moral" to experiment with than small animals and insects.
Yes, phloem is living tissue, xylem tends to be woody and dead.
Stay responsible in class. Its better than continuing this experiment in accident and emergency.
A controlled experiment is an experiment where there are limited or no variables other than the one you are testing for.
1. Better chance of uniform sample. 2. Material for confirmations if needed.