Wegener was ignored for so long because no scientists believed him about his theory of continental drift. No scientists believed him because he couldn't explain how the continents had moved until the time of Harry Hess or J. Tuzo Wilson.
The continental Coastlines fit together like puzzle pieces, fossils, and glacier Grover in warm places
A widely accepted hypothesis for the evolution of genomic imprinting is the "parental conflic.
Although it seemed to make a lot of sense, there was no known proof of HOW the continents would drift. It wasn't until years later that we gained knowledge of plate tectonics, which bolstered Wegener's hypothesis.
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was not widely accepted initially due to a lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move across the Earth's surface. His ideas challenged established geological beliefs, and many scientists were skeptical of the evidence he presented, which included similarities in fossil records and geological formations across continents. Additionally, the prevailing theory of fixed continents was supported by influential geologists, making it difficult for Wegener's ideas to gain traction. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century that his hypothesis was validated and embraced.
Because he was trying to get everybody to listen to him but they didnt want to you welcome i just answered the question for ya;; lol $hit
It may become a theory.
Another idea is that the Earth captured the Moon after its formation. ... The most widely accepted theory is that the Moon was formed.
The answer is a theory. A view that is not well-tested and widely accepted is just a hypothesis. A law has to be indisputable not just widely accepted
The continental Coastlines fit together like puzzle pieces, fossils, and glacier Grover in warm places
A widely accepted hypothesis for the evolution of genomic imprinting is the "parental conflic.
The nebular hypothesis is the most widely accepted model explaining the formation and evolution of the Solar System.
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.
The most widely accepted theory for how Earth's moon was formed is called the impact theory. It says that the moon formed from a collision between Earth and a Mars-sized object about four and a half billion years ago.
Although it seemed to make a lot of sense, there was no known proof of HOW the continents would drift. It wasn't until years later that we gained knowledge of plate tectonics, which bolstered Wegener's hypothesis.
For a hypothesis to become widely accepted by scientists, it must be supported by robust and repeatable experimental evidence. Additionally, it should withstand rigorous peer review and be consistent with existing scientific knowledge. The hypothesis should also demonstrate predictive power and be able to explain a range of phenomena within its domain. Finally, it should be open to further testing and refinement as new data emerges.
It should be widely accepted as it has no environmental impact.
Widely accepted in my big fat bum'ole