Wegener was ignored for so long because no scientists believed him about his theory of continental drift. No scientists believed him because he couldn't explain how the continents had moved until the time of Harry Hess or J. Tuzo Wilson.
The continental Coastlines fit together like puzzle pieces, fossils, and glacier Grover in warm places
A widely accepted hypothesis for the evolution of genomic imprinting is the "parental conflic.
Although it seemed to make a lot of sense, there was no known proof of HOW the continents would drift. It wasn't until years later that we gained knowledge of plate tectonics, which bolstered Wegener's hypothesis.
Because he was trying to get everybody to listen to him but they didnt want to you welcome i just answered the question for ya;; lol $hit
The Tidal Hypothesis, which suggests that the solar system formed from a tidal interaction between a passing star and the Sun, was proposed by the French mathematician and astronomer Pierre-Simon Laplace in the late 18th century. According to this theory, the gravitational pull from the passing star would have caused material to be pulled away from the Sun, leading to the formation of planets. Although this hypothesis was significant in the history of astronomical thought, it has largely been supplanted by the more widely accepted Nebular Hypothesis.
It may become a theory.
Another idea is that the Earth captured the Moon after its formation. ... The most widely accepted theory is that the Moon was formed.
The answer is a theory. A view that is not well-tested and widely accepted is just a hypothesis. A law has to be indisputable not just widely accepted
The continental Coastlines fit together like puzzle pieces, fossils, and glacier Grover in warm places
A widely accepted hypothesis for the evolution of genomic imprinting is the "parental conflic.
The nebular hypothesis is the most widely accepted model explaining the formation and evolution of the Solar System.
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.
The most widely accepted theory for how Earth's moon was formed is called the impact theory. It says that the moon formed from a collision between Earth and a Mars-sized object about four and a half billion years ago.
Although it seemed to make a lot of sense, there was no known proof of HOW the continents would drift. It wasn't until years later that we gained knowledge of plate tectonics, which bolstered Wegener's hypothesis.
It should be widely accepted as it has no environmental impact.
Widely accepted in my big fat bum'ole
In scientific research, a hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon based on limited evidence, while a theory is a well-established and widely accepted explanation that has been extensively tested and supported by evidence.