Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was not widely accepted initially due to a lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move across the Earth's surface. His ideas challenged established geological beliefs, and many scientists were skeptical of the evidence he presented, which included similarities in fossil records and geological formations across continents. Additionally, the prevailing theory of fixed continents was supported by influential geologists, making it difficult for Wegener's ideas to gain traction. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century that his hypothesis was validated and embraced.
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was not widely accepted at the time primarily due to a lack of a plausible mechanism for how continents could move. His ideas challenged the prevailing geological views, which held that continents were static. Additionally, the scientific community was skeptical of the evidence he presented, such as the fit of coastlines and fossil correlations, viewing them as insufficient to support such a revolutionary concept. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century that his ideas gained broader acceptance.
Although it seemed to make a lot of sense, there was no known proof of HOW the continents would drift. It wasn't until years later that we gained knowledge of plate tectonics, which bolstered Wegener's hypothesis.
The continental Coastlines fit together like puzzle pieces, fossils, and glacier Grover in warm places
One day while scientists were exploring the sea floor, they discovered sea-floor spreading, thus proving Wegener's hypothesis to be correct.
Wegener's hypothesis for continental drift, proposed in the early 20th century, suggests that continents were once part of a single supercontinent called Pangaea, which gradually broke apart and drifted to their current positions. He based his hypothesis on evidence such as the fit of continental coastlines, similar geological features across continents, and fossil correlations. Despite presenting compelling evidence, Wegener's theory was initially met with skepticism due to the lack of a mechanism to explain how continents could move. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics that his ideas gained widespread acceptance.
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
Fossils support his hypothesis.
His evidence was incorrect.
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was not widely accepted at the time primarily due to a lack of a plausible mechanism for how continents could move. His ideas challenged the prevailing geological views, which held that continents were static. Additionally, the scientific community was skeptical of the evidence he presented, such as the fit of coastlines and fossil correlations, viewing them as insufficient to support such a revolutionary concept. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century that his ideas gained broader acceptance.
Although it seemed to make a lot of sense, there was no known proof of HOW the continents would drift. It wasn't until years later that we gained knowledge of plate tectonics, which bolstered Wegener's hypothesis.
The scientific means for proving his hypothesis had not yet been developed.
He proposed the idea of continental dift, which is very cool!
evidence supporting the idea of sea-floor spreading.
plate tectonics
The continental Coastlines fit together like puzzle pieces, fossils, and glacier Grover in warm places
It was not excepted because they didn't believe him at all until it was proven!