Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was originally rejected by geologists primarily because he could not provide a convincing mechanism for how continents could move across the Earth's surface. His suggestion of "continental drift" lacked sufficient empirical support and was viewed as speculative. Additionally, the prevailing geological theories at the time, such as the idea of a static Earth, made it difficult for scientists to accept the concept of moving continents. Without a clear understanding of the forces involved, Wegener's ideas were largely dismissed until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century provided the necessary framework and evidence.
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was rejected because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how the continents moved. Additionally, the scientific community at the time did not have sufficient evidence to support the idea of continents drifting. It wasn't until the theory of plate tectonics emerged later, providing a mechanism and supporting evidence, that continental drift became widely accepted.
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
When scientists state that their data confirmed or rejected a hypothesis, it is typically referred to as "hypothesis testing." This process involves analyzing the collected data to determine whether it supports or contradicts the proposed hypothesis. The outcome can lead to the acceptance or rejection of the hypothesis, contributing to the scientific understanding of the phenomenon being studied.
the mechanism for continental drift was not well understood at the time, and there was no evidence to support the idea of continents moving. It wasn't until the theory of plate tectonics was developed that the idea of continental drift became widely accepted.
His evidence was incorrect.
dont ask me freak
No. The vast majority of geologists rejected Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift. it was not until more than 25 years after Wegener's death that the scientific community began to accept plate tectonics.
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
He could not explain how or why the continents moved.
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
It is when you know that your hypothesis is wrong.
A hypothesis will be rejected if it fails the necessary testing required for it to become a scientific theory.
The main objection to Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Wegener's idea of continents plowing through solid oceanic crust was not supported by scientific knowledge at that time, leading many scientists to reject his hypothesis.
because he couldn't explain what forces caused the continents to move... :D yup that's why
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was rejected because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how the continents moved. Additionally, the scientific community at the time did not have sufficient evidence to support the idea of continents drifting. It wasn't until the theory of plate tectonics emerged later, providing a mechanism and supporting evidence, that continental drift became widely accepted.
The answer to the question why is this: It can be rejected at a later date because it is falsifiable in nature if it is a good hypothesis. If you meant to ask HOW it can be rejected, the answer is by way of further experimentation that rules out some or all of the hypothesis as stated.