It would be unreasonable to expect Saturn-like rings around the inner planets due to their proximity to the Sun, which exerts strong gravitational forces that would disrupt the formation and maintenance of such rings. Additionally, the inner planets are smaller and have less mass, resulting in weaker gravitational fields that would struggle to retain the necessary debris and particles to form stable rings. The intense solar radiation and heat would also cause any potential ring material to be vaporized or dispersed.
No. Mercury, Venus and Mars are solid.
It is less likely for stars in the halo of a galaxy to have planets compared to stars in the disk of the galaxy. This is because the halo contains older stars with fewer heavy elements necessary for planet formation. However, some planets could still exist around halo stars, but they would be rare.
Neptune is expected to have the lowest surface temperature among Uranus, Saturn, and Neptune. This is due to Neptune's farther distance from the sun compared to Uranus and Saturn, resulting in less solar energy reaching its atmosphere.
The cost of a 2010 Saturn Aura can vary depending on its condition, mileage, and location. On average, you can expect to pay anywhere from $3,000 to $7,000 for a 2010 Saturn Aura. It's recommended to research current listings and speak with sellers for an accurate price.
around 6:00
When you are describing something as not reasonable, you can say, "This man is unreasonable" meaning you can not deal or reason with. Unreasonable is an adjective that means irrational, unconscionable, extravagant, senseless, or unreasonable. Example sentence: My boss was unreasonable to expect me to complete the research and hand in a report by tomorrow.
Vote Obama
Vote Obama
menu ki pta
Well, some planets, such as Mercury, have little density. For example, the amount of density in oil compared to water. That scenario is an example of the amount of density that you might expect on such planets as Venus.
Just read the Economics book. -_-
In our own solar system, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune have moons. Of the 300+ "exoplanets" that have been discovered (planets that orbit other stars) we would not expect to be able to detect moons from so far away. The probability that some of those planets will have moons is very great, however.
The question sounds as if you expect Saturn to have a surface like Earth, part of which has oceans. Let's get this clear: the giant planets - including Saturn have no surface. Instead, they are gas giants - the gas just gets denser and denser, the lower you go. Saturn will, of course, have some water vapor, water droplets and water ice in its atmosphere. Part of its rings consist of water ice as well.
Within our own solar system, terrestrial (or rocky) planets have smaller orbital distances than any of the gas giant planets. The "inner" planets Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars are all rocky, while the "outer" planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune are all gas giants. However, we have no reason to believe that this is some universal principle; we would expect to find every possible distribution of planets at any distances.
No, its not unreasonable, if he's at all thoughful he would want to get what ever specific food you want, espcially when your sick.
no planet expect Mercury
Saturn,Uranus & Neptune