Many scientists initially rejected the hypothesis of continental drift because it lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move across the Earth's surface. Alfred Wegener, who proposed the theory in 1912, suggested that continents drifted through the oceanic crust, but he could not provide a convincing explanation for the forces driving this movement. Additionally, the prevailing belief in a static Earth and the dominance of geosynclinal theory made it difficult for scientists to accept such a radical idea without substantial evidence. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century, which provided a solid framework for understanding continental movement, that the concept gained widespread acceptance.
I think that continetal drift replaced his theory
One day while scientists were exploring the sea floor, they discovered sea-floor spreading, thus proving Wegener's hypothesis to be correct.
Alfred wegener
the lateral movement of continents resulting from the motin of crustal
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was not widely accepted during his time because he could not provide a convincing mechanism for how continents could move across the Earth's surface. His ideas contradicted the prevailing geological theories, and many scientists were skeptical of his lack of evidence for a force driving the drift. Today, scientists understand that continental drift is driven by plate tectonics, where the movement of tectonic plates is caused by convection currents in the Earth's mantle. This mechanism provides a clear explanation for the movement of continents over geological time.
I think that continetal drift replaced his theory
One day while scientists were exploring the sea floor, they discovered sea-floor spreading, thus proving Wegener's hypothesis to be correct.
The main objection to Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Wegener's idea of continents plowing through solid oceanic crust was not supported by scientific knowledge at that time, leading many scientists to reject his hypothesis.
Because he didnt have enough "scientific" eviedence
It was Alfred Wegener but other scientists did not believe him but he found evidence
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
Chiken Wings But he discovered the theroy of continetal drift
Alfred wegener
Because wegner didnt have proof to show what caused mountains.
the lateral movement of continents resulting from the motin of crustal
People thought he was crazy and not very smart but he proved them. He found a way.