Ehow is not considered a highly credible source because it relies on user-generated content that may not be vetted for accuracy or expertise. It lacks the rigorous editorial standards and fact-checking processes that are common in more reputable sources. It is generally not recommended for obtaining reliable information.
its accuracy can be corroborated
Not true
It is reliable
"Credible" is defined as "Being believable, based on information, source or fact." - Something that is credible, is reliable, it's trustworthy.
study information from texts on ancient China and N. America to discern which source is credible
If a source is biased, it provides information which is slanted one way or another. It isn't a credible source because it isn't presenting the facts in a straight-forward manner.
Scholastic is generally considered a credible source, especially in the context of educational materials for children and young adults. However, as with any source, it is always recommended to verify information independently from multiple sources.
The credibility of a certain a certain blog depends on its content. You can identify it.
Yes,fairly reliable.
The keyword "credible" means able to be believed or trusted, according to the most reliable dictionary source.
Credible is believable, based on information or fact; not credible is not believable because it may be based on opinion, a biased source, and contain little actual information or fact.
Yes, Elsevier is generally considered a credible source for academic research due to its reputation as a leading publisher of scientific and scholarly journals.