Wikipedia is considered a reliable source because each article must undergo a rigorous review process, with many professional reviewers involved. Is the ideal place to start your research and get a global picture of a topic. Is always good check the facts we find in Wikipedia against other sources but Wikipedia is as accurate or more accurate than more traditional encyclopedias.
Cuneiform writing was more versatile and could represent a wider range of sounds and concepts compared to picture writing. It allowed for more complex ideas to be conveyed with greater precision and detail. Additionally, cuneiform could be adapted to write different languages, making it more flexible for communication.
It was (farming) a more reliable and stable food source than hunting/gathering.
It was much easier to create it in stone or clay tablets.
Cuneiform writing was more flexible and could represent abstract concepts, while picture writing was limited to representing concrete objects. Cuneiform also allowed for a larger range of ideas and meanings to be conveyed compared to picture writing. Additionally, cuneiform could be used to write multiple languages, while picture writing was specific to particular cultures.
trade
Unfortunately, you haven't provided a list to follow. There is not enough information to base off of to figure out which is a reliable source. You will have to post another question with more information.
help
reliable, dependable, responsible, trustworthy, trusty.These adjectives mean worthy of reliance or trust: a reliable source of information; a dependable worker; a responsible babysitter; a trustworthy report; a trusty alarm.Read more: reliable
Yes, it sure is. And far more reliable than wind!
Cuneiform was preferred over picture writing because it allowed for more complex ideas to be communicated more efficiently. Cuneiform consisted of a combination of symbols that represented both sounds and concepts, allowing for a wider range of information to be recorded. Additionally, cuneiform was better suited for representing the sounds of the spoken language, making it more adaptable for recording different dialects and languages.
it had picture symbols and ours today has no picture symbols. it different from cuneiform becuse cuneiform has more lettter symbols thhen picture