Going Public - Disadvantages
Profit-sharing
If the firm is sitting on a highly successful venture, future success (and profit) has to be shared with outsiders. After the typical IPO, about 40% of the company remains with insiders, but this can vary from 1% to 88%, with 20% to 60% being comfortably normal.
Loss of Confidentiality
A major reason why firms resist going public is the loss of confidentiality in company operations and policies. For example, a company could be destroyed if the company were to disclose its technology or profitability to its competitors.
Reporting and Fiduciary Responsibilities
Public companies must continuously file reports with the SEC and the exchange they list on. They must comply with certain state securities laws ("blue sky"), NASD and exchange guidelines. This disclosure costs money and provides information to competitors.
Loss of Control
Outsiders are often in a position to take control of corporate management and might even fire the entrepreneur/company founder. While there are effective anti-takeover measures, investors are not willing to pay a high price for a company in which poor management could not be replaced.
IPO Expenses
An IPO is a costly undertaking. A typical firm may spend about 15-25% of the money raised on direct expenses. Even more resources are spent indirectly (management time, disruption of business).
Immediate Cash-out Usually Not Permitted
Typically, IPO entrepreneurs face various restrictions that do not permit them to cash out for many months after the IPO.
Liability
The company, its management, and other participants may be subject to liability for false or misleading statements and omissions in the registration documents or in the reports filed by the company after it becomes public. In addition management may be subject to law suits by the stockholders for breaches of fiduciary duty, self dealing and other claims, whether or not true.
source:
http://www.gopublictoday.com/goingpublic…
PLC's share holdings are usually sold to the public, ie the public part own them. Limited companies, the shares stay in the company with the directors holding them, they cannot sell them to the public.
Disadvantage of a private limited bank is that they cant raise capital through public offering . They should have their own capital for the company.
Hey i bet you must need help on your coursowrk or anything and it would be plain sad if u fail or somink anywayz the disadvantages of a PLC is that your money can easily be taken
Public limited company
private limited companies are usually owned by families member. these companies are formed by at least minimum 2 share holders to maximum 50 share holders. share holders share limited liabilities and shares may not be offered to the public. no invitation of deposits from persons other than members, directors or their relative are allowed
hello mate
Private limited companies or public limited companies. Public limited's sell their shares on the stockmarket whereas private limited sell their shares individually to private holders (i.e. friends or venture capitalists etc.).
i think so that public limited companies are for the use of common peoples, for public.butthe cooperative organizations are to help out these public limited companies to solve their problem.
a kool way of explaining this is that a public limited
Public Limited Comapnies have widely held ownership ( Shares) They have unlimited liability and PVT LTD companies have limited no of People who have the shares of the company (1 - 24 persons), the ownership of the company is limited and hence the liability is also limited.
Advantages for public limited companies include unlimited liability of shareholders, legal entity (operations are unaffected by shareholder death), and no limit on the number of shareholders who can raise capital. Disadvantages include problems managing a large company, slow-decision making process and loss of control by the original founder (s).
good answer
"Businesses that are crucial in the UK are those of companies or trade, companies limited by shares, public limited companies as well as unlimited companies."
Only Public Companies as defined in Section 3(i)(iv) of companies act 1956 can use word limited in their name.Private Companies sh Only Public Companies as defined in Section 3(i)(iv) of companies act 1956 can use word limited in their name.Private Companies shall use private limited at the end of their name and it is optional for the companies registered under section 25 of the Companies act 1956 to use word limited.
Yes, subsidies simply give public limited companies. It's always been like that and it doubtless will always stay that way, too
following are the advantages of public limited company:limited liabilityshare issued to publiclarge capitaldistribution of workloadteam workcentralization systemfollowing are the disadvantage of public limited companylack of secrecyleg pullinglack of interests of employeesgovernment restrictions.
Limited company can be public or private. There is no necessary a limited company should be a public company. Public companies are those company which are registered with company act 2013 under section 2(71). However a public company must be have a limited liability.