Yes.
Both.
Yes.
In ancient Athens, girls typically stayed home with their mothers, focusing on domestic duties and preparing for their roles as wives and mothers. In contrast, Spartan girls received a more active education, participating in physical training and sports alongside boys, and had more freedom than their Athenian counterparts. While both city-states had distinct views on gender roles, the upbringing of girls differed significantly between Athens and Sparta.
No. Girls were home schooled by their mothers.
They went to school until they knew how to read The Bible. Then, some boys would become apprentices and the girls went home to help their mothers
The boys help there fathers in the fields. The girls help their mothers at home, cooking, cleaning, weaving. The kids had arranged marriages and became adults at the age of 12.
Spartan women had more rights and freedoms than Athenian women. Spartan women were educated, could own property, and participate in sports, while Athenian women had limited rights and were mostly confined to the home as wives and mothers.
Tudor girls didn't go to school but some girls were taught by their mothers at home. It was mainly the very rich ones who where home tutored.
in ancient Greece the girls were taught by there mothers at home things like cooking cleaning and sewing
In most city-states, the place of females was in the home cleaning, spinning and gardening vegetables, looking after chickens and milking goats. Their future was in bearing and raising children. A Spartan family was supported by the output of the serf population, and the girls were free to engage in athletics an sports and a degree of general education.
They worked out in the fields when they were old enough
When the men were at war, girls often took on increased responsibilities at home to support their families. They helped their mothers with chores such as cooking, cleaning, and caring for younger siblings. Many also participated in community efforts, such as sewing uniforms or gathering supplies for the troops. This involvement not only helped sustain their households but also fostered a sense of resilience and solidarity during difficult times.