answersLogoWhite

0

Bikrami, or the Vikram Samvat, is a Hindu calendar system that typically runs about 56.7 years ahead of the Gregorian calendar. The year Bikrami 2034 corresponds to the Gregorian year 1977-1978. This calendar is primarily used in India and Nepal for religious and cultural purposes.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was the year of bikrami calendar in 1987?

The Bikrami calendar, also known as the Vikram Samvat, is approximately 57 years ahead of the Gregorian calendar. In 1987, the corresponding year in the Bikrami calendar would be 1944. This is calculated by adding 57 years to 1987.


What is the year at presnt in bikrami calendar?

1967


What is the current bikrami year?

As of October 2023, the current Bikrami year is 2080. The Bikrami calendar, also known as the Vikram Samvat, is a luni-solar calendar used in India and Nepal, typically running approximately 56.7 years ahead of the Gregorian calendar. The year begins in the month of Chaitra, which usually falls in March or April.


What was bikrami calendar date on 9 December 1887?

26 Maghar


What will be 26 November 1965 convert to exist date bikrami calendar?

Puranmashi kattak November 1469


Which is the modern calendar the Gregorian calendar or the Julian calendar?

the Gregorian calendar


When will the calendar year 2006 repeat?

2006, 2017, 2023, 2034, 2045, 2051, 2062, 2073, 2079, 2090, 2102, 2113, 2119.


What day will it be on June 17 2034?

June 17th 2034 will be on a Saturday


Does Egypt have a calendar?

There was an ancient Egyptian calendar, but modern Egypt uses the Coptic Calendar, which is based on the calendar of ancient Egypt.


When will the calendar year 2017 repeat exactly and continue for several years?

For the rest of this century 2017 will be repeated exactly in 2023, 2034, 2045, 2051, 2062, 2073, 2079 and 2090.


Who developed the modern calendar?

The calendar was technically first invented by the Ancient Egyptians.


How was a modern calendar developed?

it wasnt